2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No substantial preexisting B cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in healthy adults

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference in the extent of B and T cell responses between vaccinated individuals and healthy donors (Figures 2B, 3A). Our data are consistent with the presence of cross-reactive B cells against the non-RBD portions of Omicron in unvaccinated uninfected individuals (62) with no preexisting B cell immunity against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 of the Wuhan Hu-1 variant (63). As for memory B cells, there were no differences in terms of either the frequency or phenotype of CD27 + B cells between previously infected and infection-naïve subjects (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There was no difference in the extent of B and T cell responses between vaccinated individuals and healthy donors (Figures 2B, 3A). Our data are consistent with the presence of cross-reactive B cells against the non-RBD portions of Omicron in unvaccinated uninfected individuals (62) with no preexisting B cell immunity against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 of the Wuhan Hu-1 variant (63). As for memory B cells, there were no differences in terms of either the frequency or phenotype of CD27 + B cells between previously infected and infection-naïve subjects (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Given the high prevalence of immunity to endemic betacoronaviruses (e.g., HCoV-OC43), it was speculated whether B cell reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 may preexist in naive individuals and shape immunological outcomes of infec-tion. Although SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies could be observed in rare cases (Anderson et al, 2021;Ng et al, 2020) and monoclonal antibodies with low neutralizing activity have been reported in seronegative individuals (Feldman et al, 2021), SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity was mostly undetectable in prepandemic samples (Ercanoglu et al, 2022;Poston et al, 2021). However, upon exposure to SARS-CoV-2 antigen, activation of preexisting betacoronavirus-reactive B cells could be detected but was not associated with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection (Anderson et al, 2021;Sokal et al, 2021;Song et al, 2021;Turner et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Development Of Sars-cov-2 Neutralizing Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…77,78 However, none of the wild-type or germline variant antibodies showed any reactivity against OC43, HKU1, NL63, or 229E spike proteins, supporting previous studies that found only little or no recall from memory HCoV responses. 79,80 In the context of other pathogens including HIV-1, HCV, or RSV, it has been shown that antibodies carry mutations that are neglectable for binding or neutralization. [14][15][16] Concordantly, we identified a fraction of mutated anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (~11%) that bound and neutralized Wu01 independently of acquired mutations, at least within the resolution of our assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%