2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(06)80097-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No stage migration due to the introduction of the sentinel node procedure: a population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This meta-analysis comprises all currently available data from randomized trials comparing SNB and ALND in clinically node negative breast cancer; these results show no difference in the detection of nodal positivity across all trials with a trend towards an improved detection of metastatic lymph nodes when SNB is used. In this analysis, patients undergoing SNB have a 22% higher odds ratio of having a positive node, a finding that is likely to be due to the more intensive pathologic examination using multiple sections and immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is employed to evaluate the sentinel node and which makes detection of malignant cells more likely [17]. Whilst it is clear that there is a false negative rate associated with identification of incorrect nodes as the sentinel node or failure to identify all of the sentinel nodes, this source of false negative results decreases with increasing experience of the surgeon [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta-analysis comprises all currently available data from randomized trials comparing SNB and ALND in clinically node negative breast cancer; these results show no difference in the detection of nodal positivity across all trials with a trend towards an improved detection of metastatic lymph nodes when SNB is used. In this analysis, patients undergoing SNB have a 22% higher odds ratio of having a positive node, a finding that is likely to be due to the more intensive pathologic examination using multiple sections and immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is employed to evaluate the sentinel node and which makes detection of malignant cells more likely [17]. Whilst it is clear that there is a false negative rate associated with identification of incorrect nodes as the sentinel node or failure to identify all of the sentinel nodes, this source of false negative results decreases with increasing experience of the surgeon [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies showed a 4.3-10% increase among patients diagnosed with micrometastatic disease in the sentinel node as well [9,10]. This increase led to stage migration after adjustment for the simultaneous, favorable trend in tumor size [9]. A discussion followed on prognostic significance and possible need for additional systemic and regional treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who underwent SLN biopsy with a negative SLN have an improved disease-free and overall survival compared with node negative axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) patients [4,5]. The reason for this observation is clearly the more extensive histopathologic workup of lymph nodes resulting in a more accurate axillary staging, a reduced rate of false-negative results and stage migration [6,7]. SLN biopsy has been reported to result in an increased quality of life with reduced morbidity, but especially younger patients after isolated SLN biopsy with early breast cancer showed greater procedure-associated levels of anxiety [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%