2011
DOI: 10.1080/00346760802714875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Small Hope: The Basic Goods Imperative

Abstract: This paper argues in favor of a basic goods approach to outcomes assessment in development policy analysis. It contrasts the basic goods approach with the utility-of-consumption and capabilities approaches and argues, on a number of grounds, that it is a more relevant and appropriate framework. The dimensions of the basic goods approach analyzed include a common, minimalist character, sense of justice, subjectivist-objectivist considerations, the human condition, relationship to policy space, and the theoretic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the capabilities approach, as discussed earlier, and to subjective approaches that view individuals' preferences as necessary for defining well-being [20]. Our approach follows and builds on the minimalist basic goods approach of Kenneth Reinert, which appeals to both objectivist and subjectivist traditions and is particularly appropriate for assessing development policy [21].…”
Section: A "Basic Goods" Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to the capabilities approach, as discussed earlier, and to subjective approaches that view individuals' preferences as necessary for defining well-being [20]. Our approach follows and builds on the minimalist basic goods approach of Kenneth Reinert, which appeals to both objectivist and subjectivist traditions and is particularly appropriate for assessing development policy [21].…”
Section: A "Basic Goods" Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinert refers to Griffin's definition of basic needs "as what we need to survive, to be healthy, to avoid harm, to function properly" [25]. Along with education, these categories comprise the elements of other formulations of "basic needs" [21]. Clothing, while included in Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 25), is in fact not consistently present in detailed accounts of basic needs or poverty indices.…”
Section: What Constitute Basic Goods?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has further been argued that correcting under-provision of the material foundations necessary to fulfil basic human needs through expanded access to infrastructure for, inter alia, water, sanitation, electricity, telephony, education, and healthcare, should be regarded as one of the central aims of public policy (Jakob and Edenhofer, 2014). This view is consistent with a broader view in social policy of a universal entitlement to basic goods (Reinert, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The capabilities approach or human development perspective emphasizes peoples' abilities to achieve certain desired outcomes in the realm of “doing” and “being,” such as avoiding premature mortality or being literate (e.g., Nussbaum, ; Sen, ). The basic goods approach emphasizes the provision of basic goods and services as key ingredients of human well‐being and argues that a focus on these determinants is more helpful than a focus on outcomes (e.g., Reinert, ).…”
Section: The Basic Goods Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%