2021
DOI: 10.3390/universe7040108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-Slip Boundary Conditions for Electron Hydrodynamics and the Thermal Casimir Pressure

Abstract: We derive modified reflection coefficients for electromagnetic waves in the THz and far infrared range. The idea is based on hydrodynamic boundary conditions for metallic conduction electrons. The temperature-dependent part of the Casimir pressure between metal plates is evaluated. The results should shed light on the “thermal anomaly,” where measurements deviate from the standard fluctuation electrodynamics for conducting metals.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An inclusion of the relaxation of conduction electrons (i.e., using the dissipative Drude model at low frequencies) results in a strong contradiction between experiment and theory over the range of separations from 0.2 to 4.8 µm. These results are in line with previous precise experiments on measuring the Casimir interaction at shorter sphere-plate separations [61,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] and discussions of the so-called Casimir puzzle [82][83][84] (see also recent approaches to the resolution of this problem [85][86][87]).…”
Section: (T)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…An inclusion of the relaxation of conduction electrons (i.e., using the dissipative Drude model at low frequencies) results in a strong contradiction between experiment and theory over the range of separations from 0.2 to 4.8 µm. These results are in line with previous precise experiments on measuring the Casimir interaction at shorter sphere-plate separations [61,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] and discussions of the so-called Casimir puzzle [82][83][84] (see also recent approaches to the resolution of this problem [85][86][87]).…”
Section: (T)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to our results, the suggested experiment will be capable to clearly discriminate between the magnetic fields computed using the Drude and plasma models but not between the fields computed using the plasma model and the spatially nonlocal permittivity of [58]. The latter, in any case, does not claim a complete description of the electromagnetic response of metals but can be considered as an example that through the spatial nonlocality in the framework of the Lifshitz theory it is possible to reach an agreement with the requirements of thermodynamics and the measurement data of high-precision experiments having regard to the relaxation properties of conduction electrons (see also [104] which considers other nonlocal permittivities with the same aim).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and ε(ω) is the frequencydependent dielectric permittivity of the plate metal. In this section, however, we do not use a specific form of the reflection coefficients making the results applicable to both the local and nonlocal response of the metal (note that the spatially nonlocal models are the subject of considerable discussion in relation to the problems of the Lifshitz theory mentioned above [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]). It has to be stressed also that in the configuration of fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%