No Significant Effect of 3d Modelling on Surgical Planning in Spinal Deformities

Guran, Ortac; Oflaz, Hakan; Günal, İzge

doi:10.1590/1413-785220223001e248982

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Simulation with 3D printing allows for the creation of several models from one patient and for the process to be reproduced as many times as needed for training. While 3D printing has many advantages, this process has some limitations [ 28 ]. The materials available are limited by their thermodynamic characteristics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Low-Cost 3D Models for Cervical Spine Tumor Removal Training for Neurosurgery Residents

Sufianov,

Ovalle,

Cruz

et al. 2024

Brain Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: Spinal surgery, particularly for cervical pathologies such as myelopathy and radiculopathy, requires a blend of theoretical knowledge and practical skill. The complexity of these conditions, often necessitating surgical intervention, underscores the need for intricate understanding and precision in execution. Advancements in neurosurgical training, especially with the use of low-cost 3D models for simulating cervical spine tumor removal, are revolutionizing this field. These models provide the realistic and hands-on experience crucial for mastering complex neurosurgical techniques, filling gaps left by traditional educational methods. Materials and Methods: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of 3D-printed cervical vertebrae models in enhancing surgical skills, focusing on tumor removal, and involving 20 young neurosurgery residents. These models, featuring silicone materials to simulate the spinal cord and tumor tissues, provided a realistic training experience. The training protocol included a laminectomy, dural incision, and tumor resection, using a range of microsurgical tools, focusing on steps usually performed by senior surgeons. Results: The training program received high satisfaction rates, with 85% of participants extremely satisfied and 15% satisfied. The 3D models were deemed very realistic by 85% of participants, effectively replicating real-life scenarios. A total of 80% found that the simulated pathologies were varied and accurate, and 90% appreciated the models’ accurate tactile feedback. The training was extremely useful for 85% of the participants in developing surgical skills, with significant post-training confidence boosts and a strong willingness to recommend the program to peers. Conclusions: Continuing laboratory training for residents is crucial. Our model offers essential, accessible training for all hospitals, regardless of their resources, promising improved surgical quality and patient outcomes across various pathologies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%