The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1177/003172170408500513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No School Left Unscathed

Abstract: HERE'S SOMETHING wrong with a law that brands good schools with "failing" labels, places the heaviest burdens on states that were already striving to meet challenging education goals, imposes inflexible rules, and fails to make good on promises to pay for programs that would help struggling schools meet the demands of the law. These are the features of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, which was passed with great fanfare and hope two years ago but now is mired in complexity and is the cause of wides… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E-mail: dominiqueshih@hotmail.com and educators have mainly debated whether high-stakes standardized testing generates positive or detrimental washback (e.g., see Cizek, 2001;Ohanian, 2001;Rich, 2003;Thompson, 2001). Although they are still at loggerheads over this issue, a resounding number of educators and researchers consider high-stakes standardized tests as inducing deleterious effects on teaching and learning (e.g., Allen, 2004;Kohn, 2000;Marshak, 2003;Popham, 2004;Thomas & Bainbridge, 2002;Wagner, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-mail: dominiqueshih@hotmail.com and educators have mainly debated whether high-stakes standardized testing generates positive or detrimental washback (e.g., see Cizek, 2001;Ohanian, 2001;Rich, 2003;Thompson, 2001). Although they are still at loggerheads over this issue, a resounding number of educators and researchers consider high-stakes standardized tests as inducing deleterious effects on teaching and learning (e.g., Allen, 2004;Kohn, 2000;Marshak, 2003;Popham, 2004;Thomas & Bainbridge, 2002;Wagner, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%