1992
DOI: 10.2307/205240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Rights on This Floor: Third Parties and the Institutionalization of Congress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adoption of Reed's Rules replaced the ability of minority party members to delay bill debate by refusing to participate in quorum counting procedures (Argersinger 1992;Cooper and Young 1989). Reed's Rules, adopted in tandem with rules regarding the previous question, motions to reconsider, and the five-minute rule gave the majority party more power to control the House floor procedure.…”
Section: The Partisan Era 1830s-1900smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adoption of Reed's Rules replaced the ability of minority party members to delay bill debate by refusing to participate in quorum counting procedures (Argersinger 1992;Cooper and Young 1989). Reed's Rules, adopted in tandem with rules regarding the previous question, motions to reconsider, and the five-minute rule gave the majority party more power to control the House floor procedure.…”
Section: The Partisan Era 1830s-1900smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, civil service reforms like the 1883 Pendleton Act 4 lessened parties' ability to ensure loyalty through patronage. Due to these changes, Congress became less vulnerable to minority party influence, new members, and new parties and could become more informed about pending legislation, resulting in a decreased need of sunset provisions (Argersinger 1992).…”
Section: The Partisan Era 1830s-1900smentioning
confidence: 99%