2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2014.7025098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-reference video quality assessment via feature learning

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel "Opinion Free" (OF) No-Reference Video Quality Assessment (NR-VQA) algorithm based on frame-level unsupervised feature learning and hysteresis temporal pooling. The system consists of three components: feature extraction with max-min pooling, frame quality prediction and temporal pooling. Frame level features are first extracted by unsupervised feature learning and used to train a linear Support Vector Regressor (SVR) for predicting quality scores frame by frame. Frame-level q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivated by the success of CORNIA [39] NR image quality assessment method, Xu et al [37] presented an opinionunaware architecture for NR-VQA, the so-called Video CORNIA. In particular, frame-level features are extracted via unsupervised feature learning and applied a support vector regressor (SVR) to map these onto subjective quality scores.…”
Section: Related and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motivated by the success of CORNIA [39] NR image quality assessment method, Xu et al [37] presented an opinionunaware architecture for NR-VQA, the so-called Video CORNIA. In particular, frame-level features are extracted via unsupervised feature learning and applied a support vector regressor (SVR) to map these onto subjective quality scores.…”
Section: Related and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods were evaluated using fivefold cross-validation with 10 random train-validationtest split, and median PLCC and SROCC values are reported as proposed in [17] and [18]. The median PLCC and SROCC values of five baseline methods (Video BLIINDS [23], VIIDEO [20], Video CORNIA [37], FC Model [17], and STFC Model [18]) were measured by Men et al in [17] and [18]. On the other hand, the results of STS-MLP [38] and STS-SVR [38] were taken from their original publication because their authors also report on median PLCC and SROCC values using fivefold cross-validation with 10 random train-validation-test split.…”
Section: Comparison With the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, which is based on mapping framelevel features into a spatial quality score followed by temporal pooling. The authors in Ref.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seshadrinathan and Bovik [37] notice the temporal hysteresis effect in the subjective experiments, and propose a temporal hysteresis pooling strategy for quality assessment. The effectiveness of this strategy has been verified in [3,37,50]. We also take account of the temporal hysteresis effects.…”
Section: Temporal Modelingmentioning
confidence: 94%