2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-016-0957-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-reference image quality assessment in complex-shearlet domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we have investigated the use of deep learning for distortion-generic blind image quality assessment. We report on different design choices in three different experiments, ranging from the use of features [31] 0.94 0.94 BLIINDS-II [39] 0.92 0.91 NIQE [32] 0.92 0.91 C-DIIVINE [51] 0.95 0.94 FRIQUEE [12,14] 0.95 0.93 ShearletIQM [29] 0.94 0.93 MGMSD [1] 0.97 0.97 Low Level Features [21] 0.95 0.94 Rectifier Neural Network [45] -0.96 Multi-task CNN [20] 0.95 0.95 Shallow CNN [19] 0.95 0.96 DLIQA [16] 0.93 0.93 HOSA [49] 0.95 0.95 CNN-Prewitt [27] 0.97 0.96 CNN-SVR [26] 0.97 0.96 DeepBIQ 0.98 0.97 [31] 0.93 0.91 BLIINDS-II [39] 0.93 0.91 Low Level Features [21] 0.94 0.94 Multi-task CNN [20] 0.93 0.94 HOSA [49] 0.95 0.93 DeepBIQ 0.97 0.96…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work we have investigated the use of deep learning for distortion-generic blind image quality assessment. We report on different design choices in three different experiments, ranging from the use of features [31] 0.94 0.94 BLIINDS-II [39] 0.92 0.91 NIQE [32] 0.92 0.91 C-DIIVINE [51] 0.95 0.94 FRIQUEE [12,14] 0.95 0.93 ShearletIQM [29] 0.94 0.93 MGMSD [1] 0.97 0.97 Low Level Features [21] 0.95 0.94 Rectifier Neural Network [45] -0.96 Multi-task CNN [20] 0.95 0.95 Shallow CNN [19] 0.95 0.96 DLIQA [16] 0.93 0.93 HOSA [49] 0.95 0.95 CNN-Prewitt [27] 0.97 0.96 CNN-SVR [26] 0.97 0.96 DeepBIQ 0.98 0.97 [31] 0.93 0.91 BLIINDS-II [39] 0.93 0.91 Low Level Features [21] 0.94 0.94 Multi-task CNN [20] 0.93 0.94 HOSA [49] 0.95 0.93 DeepBIQ 0.97 0.96…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,35,48,4,15,1], reduced-reference image quality assessment (RR-IQA) algorithms, and no-reference/blind image quality assessment (NR-IQA) algorithms e.g. [34,31,32,29,26,27]. FR-IQA algorithms perform a direct comparison between the image under test and a reference or original in a properly defined image space [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method is compared with several FR (PSNR, SSIM [1], FSIM [2] and HDR-VDP-2.2 [18]), RR (OSVP-RR [7]) and NR IQA (ShearletIQM [19], DIIVINE [3] and BLIINDS II [4]) metrics. Table I shows the performance of the proposed method on the MDID2015 database over 100 train-test iterations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthetic distortion based on NR-IQA can be grouped to: (1) natural scene statistical-based models (NSS), (2) manual feature extraction-based models and (3) deep learning-based models. There are a number of NSS-based NR-IQA methods such as BRISQUE [ 8 ], NIQE [ 9 ], BIQI [ 10 ], DIIVINE [ 11 ], BLIINDS [ 12 ], ShearletIQM [ 13 ] and SPNSS [ 14 ]. Moreover, CORINA [ 15 ] is NR-IQA-based model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%