2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neps.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No plastidial calmodulin-like proteins detected by two targeted mass-spectrometry approaches and GFP fusion proteins

Abstract: Supplementary data: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neps.2016.08.001International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1c), indicating its ability to bind Ca 2+ . This result is consistent with the recent report that CML41 binds to phenyl sepharose in a Ca 2+ -dependent manner (Dell'Aglio et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…1c), indicating its ability to bind Ca 2+ . This result is consistent with the recent report that CML41 binds to phenyl sepharose in a Ca 2+ -dependent manner (Dell'Aglio et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…For decades, the Ca 2+ /Calmodulin (CaM)-dependence of NADK activity has been recognized (Muto and Miyachi, 1977; Anderson et al, 1980; Karita et al, 2004) and NADK2 was reported capable of binding to CaM in vitro (Turner et al, 2004). However, no candidate CaM and no response to Ca 2+ in NADK2 activity have been reported elsewhere (Dell’Aglio et al, 2016). Instead of NADK2, it was recently reported that Arabidopsis P-loop ATPase has CaM-dependent NADK activity (Dell’Aglio et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For decades, it has been proposed that a large amount of plant NADK is strictly dependent on the presence of Ca 2+ and calmodulin (CaM) (Muto and Miyachi, 1977;Anderson et al, 1980;Karita et al, 2004). Even now, the Ca 2+ /CaM-dependence of NADK regulation is still controversial because of several discrepancies between in vitro assays and subcellular localizations of NADK and CaM (Turner et al, 2004;Dell'Aglio et al, 2016). Besides its dependence on CaM, NADK activity may be regulated by its reduction state and phytochrome levels (Tezuka and Yamamoto, 1975;Delumeau et al, 2000), although there have been unfortunately no further reports on these subjects to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%