2020
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“No one wants to look after the fibro patient”. Understanding models, and patient perspectives, of care for fibromyalgia: reviews of current evidence

Abstract: Fibromyalgia is a common and complex long-term pain condition. Despite advancements in our understanding and treatment of fibromyalgia, patients report patchy health care provision and frustrating journeys through the health care system. To inform how best to deliver care, we undertook 2 narrative reviews examining existing evidence on (1) models of care for fibromyalgia and (2) patients' experiences, preferences, and unmet needs regarding their health care. Seven databases were systematically searched. Quanti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…PREMs are becoming increasingly incorporated in the Swedish National Quality Registers ( Nilsson et al., 2016 ). A review has summarized which care preferences patients with fibromyalgia have and they included patient-centered communication styles such as shared decision-making about care, reciprocal information sharing and increased mutual understanding ( Doebl et al., 2020 ). Furthermore, the study presented ideas from patients on how health care personnel could improve their care such as; allow patients experiences and expertise to be heard, acknowledge fibromyalgia as a condition in need of healthcare, increase knowledge about fibromyalgia and giving appropriate support ( Doebl et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PREMs are becoming increasingly incorporated in the Swedish National Quality Registers ( Nilsson et al., 2016 ). A review has summarized which care preferences patients with fibromyalgia have and they included patient-centered communication styles such as shared decision-making about care, reciprocal information sharing and increased mutual understanding ( Doebl et al., 2020 ). Furthermore, the study presented ideas from patients on how health care personnel could improve their care such as; allow patients experiences and expertise to be heard, acknowledge fibromyalgia as a condition in need of healthcare, increase knowledge about fibromyalgia and giving appropriate support ( Doebl et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review has summarized which care preferences patients with fibromyalgia have and they included patient-centered communication styles such as shared decision-making about care, reciprocal information sharing and increased mutual understanding ( Doebl et al., 2020 ). Furthermore, the study presented ideas from patients on how health care personnel could improve their care such as; allow patients experiences and expertise to be heard, acknowledge fibromyalgia as a condition in need of healthcare, increase knowledge about fibromyalgia and giving appropriate support ( Doebl et al., 2020 ). A Swedish study has found that people with fibromyalgia find support in fibromyalgia associations, where they could get confirmation, understanding and information from each other that the health care personnel could not satisfy ( Juuso et al., 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review reported no clear evidence of the bene t of treating FM in secondary care. The authors recommend developing a new model of care for FM, and highlight the potential bene ts of providing care in a primary care setting 21 . Transferring the FSMP to a community setting presents opportunities to offer specialised care closer to home and determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As support for self-management is increasingly called for by both patients and clinicians [6,20], understanding the broad effectiveness literature in this domain is critical to support the implementation and development of effective self-management interventions for CWP. For the current review, we drew on a definition of self-management that aligned conceptually with key aspects of a self-management approach [10][11][12][13]; combining multiple components and the teaching of skills that could be applied beyond the intervention: Miles et al [21] define selfmanagement interventions as multicomponent programmes which aim to improve health or quality of life, with opportunities for improvements in individuals' abilities to manage their own health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%