2015
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No One Can Whistle a Symphony: Seeking a Catalogers’ Code of Ethics

Abstract: and a Doctor of Music from the University of Oregon. Her interests include cataloging ethics, academic integrity, and cross-disciplinary collaboration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While cataloging researchers and practitioners have been contemplating cataloging ethics for decades (e.g., Berman, 1971; Olson, 2002), social justice movements and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in the last 10 years have yielded greater awareness of ethical issues in cataloging and an increase in the number of research studies and initiatives exploring ethics in cataloging work. Recent research literature on cataloging ethics has focused on topics such as the need for a cataloging code of ethics, as well as ethical issues related to subject vocabularies and classification systems, descriptive cataloging and authority work, and cataloging for specific topics, audiences, and materials (e.g., Shoemaker, 2015; Watson, 2020; Billey, Drabinski, Roberto, 2014; Lee, Nam, & Nam, 2013; Dobreski, Snow, & Moulaison‐Sandy, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cataloging researchers and practitioners have been contemplating cataloging ethics for decades (e.g., Berman, 1971; Olson, 2002), social justice movements and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in the last 10 years have yielded greater awareness of ethical issues in cataloging and an increase in the number of research studies and initiatives exploring ethics in cataloging work. Recent research literature on cataloging ethics has focused on topics such as the need for a cataloging code of ethics, as well as ethical issues related to subject vocabularies and classification systems, descriptive cataloging and authority work, and cataloging for specific topics, audiences, and materials (e.g., Shoemaker, 2015; Watson, 2020; Billey, Drabinski, Roberto, 2014; Lee, Nam, & Nam, 2013; Dobreski, Snow, & Moulaison‐Sandy, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge organization (KO) discourse about ethical responsibility shows how the act of classifying and cataloging a document has an ethical dimension (for example, Bair 2005, Shoemaker 2015, Snow 2015). An important aspect of this research has been to consider the ethics of dealing with works which are in some way deceptive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied ethics of constructing metadata includes a variety of different approaches. For example, some works focus on codes and guidelines for doing ethical KO in practice (for instance, Shoemaker 2015, Bair 2005; others focus on specific scenarios or types of material, such as ethical issues in authority control for zine authors (Fox and Swickard 2019) or dealing with so-called "bad books" (Homan 2012). Therefore, this article utilizes the KO applied ethics literature which discusses ethical codes and guidelines, yet uses it to discuss a very specific scenario involving art documentation.…”
Section: Introducing Applied Ethics Literature In Knowledge Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antes de apresentar exemplos de problemas relacionados às biases nos sistemas de organização do conhecimento, é importante lembrar que existem algumas presunções na organização do conhecimento que vêm sendo tomadas como verdades inquestionáveis e que poderiam causar danos às comunidades de usuários. Algumas dessas presunções são: universalidade (OLSON, 2002), bibliocentrismo (SMIRAGLIA, 2009;, neutralidade (MAI, 2013;MILANI, 2014;SHOEMAKER, 2015) e imparcialidade das categorias mutuamente exclusivas (FOX, 2015). Apesar de pouco abordadas, essas presunções vêm sendo mencionadas de maneira implícita pela literatura especializada, em que prevalecem as críticas relacionadas aos sistemas de organização do conhecimento, mais especificamente as listas de cabeçalhos de assunto.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified