2014
DOI: 10.1353/atj.2014.0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No More Masterpieces: Tangible Impacts and Intangible Cultural Heritage in Bordered Worlds

Abstract: UNESCO since the 1970s has debated the best way to support and preserve cultural heritage forms. Masterpieces of Oral and Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity were declared from 2001 until 2006, when the new Intangible Cultural Heritage convention replaced that program. Japan provided models and leadership for the masterpieces program. New thinking in museum practice, interest in finding ways to value performing arts as much as geographical or architectural monuments, and hopes for safeguarding and giving … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To promote the safeguarding of intangible heritage, in 1993, South Korea recommended its governmental safeguarding program—the “Living Human Treasures System,” to the UNESCO ()—while Japan financially supported a Japan Fund‐in‐Trust for ICH safeguarding and fostered an alternative understanding of key UNESCO concepts such as that of “authenticity” via the Nara Convention of 1994 (UNESCO ). In addition, inspired by the Japanese ICP model, the Proclamation of Masterpieces of Oral and Intangible Cultural Heritage was adopted by the UNESCO in 1998, creating a new UNESCO list to inscribe “outstanding” ICH practices (Foley , 380; UNESCO ). The newly elected UNESCO Director General, Kōichirō Matsuura from Japan, vigorously promoted the program (Munjeri , 132).…”
Section: The Ich Convention: An International Critical Juncturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To promote the safeguarding of intangible heritage, in 1993, South Korea recommended its governmental safeguarding program—the “Living Human Treasures System,” to the UNESCO ()—while Japan financially supported a Japan Fund‐in‐Trust for ICH safeguarding and fostered an alternative understanding of key UNESCO concepts such as that of “authenticity” via the Nara Convention of 1994 (UNESCO ). In addition, inspired by the Japanese ICP model, the Proclamation of Masterpieces of Oral and Intangible Cultural Heritage was adopted by the UNESCO in 1998, creating a new UNESCO list to inscribe “outstanding” ICH practices (Foley , 380; UNESCO ). The newly elected UNESCO Director General, Kōichirō Matsuura from Japan, vigorously promoted the program (Munjeri , 132).…”
Section: The Ich Convention: An International Critical Juncturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This global influence of the Japanese model was furthermore fostered by several decades of positive domestic policy feedback and active international promotion by the Japanese government and other supporters since the early 1990s. As stated by Kathy Foley (2014, 380), “it is likely that, without Japan’s model and Japanese leadership, neither the masterpiece program nor the 2003 convention would have been developed.”…”
Section: The Ich Convention: An International Critical Juncturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But at the same time, they miss a less traditional teaching of history, which combines the conceptual with the procedural and attitudinal (Sanger et al, 2015). As for heritage, they attach great value not only to the material, that is, the monumental, which has always appeared in legislative decrees and manuals, but also to the intangible, especially issues such as music (Foley, 2014). However, they lack skills when it comes to their implementation in the classroom.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, tangible heritage is a priority of research among Japanese universities, while the intangible cultural heritage is not yet an independent discipline (Schmitt, 2008). In Korea, to protect the traditional arts, the successors are provided with assistance such as social security and establishment of teaching facilities with plans for connection with mandatory teaching systems (Foley, 2014). Overall, governments around the world are fully aware that integration with the formal teaching system is necessary for protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%