1997
DOI: 10.4135/9781483328034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No More Kin: Exploring Race, Class, and Gender in Family Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
237
2
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
237
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We saw instances where women used familial ties for social support in ways that are consistent with a literature that describes minority populations as prioritizing family well-being over individual well-being (see Moore and Pachon 1985;Roschelle 1997). Our observations are also reminiscent of classic studies of extended African-American families in the 1960s and 1970s, where pooling resources aided in survival (Liebow 1967;Rochelle 1997;Stack 1974).…”
Section: Social Supportsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We saw instances where women used familial ties for social support in ways that are consistent with a literature that describes minority populations as prioritizing family well-being over individual well-being (see Moore and Pachon 1985;Roschelle 1997). Our observations are also reminiscent of classic studies of extended African-American families in the 1960s and 1970s, where pooling resources aided in survival (Liebow 1967;Rochelle 1997;Stack 1974).…”
Section: Social Supportsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Researchers observe that limited resources can leave expectations for reciprocity unmet (Hogan, Eggebeen, and Clogg 1993). Unmet reciprocity can increase tension and potentially lead to the dissolution of relationships (Belle 1982;Menjívar 1997Menjívar , 2000Roschelle 1997). …”
Section: The Role Of Social Capital In Survival and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that attempt to measure the amount of social capital in someone's life, for example, assume that the presence of social capital alone is positive (Kawachi, Kennedy, Lochner, & Prothrow-Stith, 1997;Kawachi, 1999;Lochner et al, 1999). Putnam (2000), Coleman (1990), Portes (2000), and others contend that social capital also can have a negative component, preventing individuals from accessing needed resources, depleting limited time and energy, and introducing destructive behaviors (Corcoran & Adams, 1997;Roschelle, 1997;Antonucci, Akiyama, & Lansford, 1998). Savage and Russell (2005), for example, studied homeless co-morbid women who suffered traumas, and found that a "small but definite" portion of the women's support networks also abused them, caused trauma, and facilitated their drug use.…”
Section: Social Capital As a Conceptual Model For Understanding Sociamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, within the sizeable underclass in the United States today, both blood and fictive kin frequently organize flexibly to provide a broad family base for young children (CrosbieBurnett & Lewis, 1999), promoting continuous responsibility for dependent children even across changes in relationships among adults. In such families, the relevant coparenting "unit" may involve many or even all of those adults involved in the nurturance and support of an identified child regardless of household membership, demanding that researchers be especially attentive in defining the functional family group (Brooks-Gunn &Furstenberg, 1986;Crosbie-Burnett&Lewis, 1999;Roschelle, 1997;Stack, 1974).…”
Section: Coparenting In Diverse Family Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%