2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3156796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study

Abstract: Response inhibition is the cognitive process required to cancel an intended action. During that process, a “go” reaction is intercepted particularly by the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA). After the commission of inhibition errors, theta activity (4–8 Hz) is related to the adaption processes. In this study, we intend to examine whether the boosting of theta activity by electrical stimulation over rIFG reduces the number of errors and the reaction times in a respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For executive functions, most studies applied online stimulation with the goal of entrainment. Faster responseswere induced by theta-tACS during response inhibition [55,57,60] and by alpha-or beta-tACS during time estimation [59]. Additionally, individual alpha-peak-tACS increased mental rotation performance [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For executive functions, most studies applied online stimulation with the goal of entrainment. Faster responseswere induced by theta-tACS during response inhibition [55,57,60] and by alpha-or beta-tACS during time estimation [59]. Additionally, individual alpha-peak-tACS increased mental rotation performance [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, individual alpha-peak-tACS increased mental rotation performance [58]. Delta-, alpha-, beta-, and gamma-tACS exerted no effect on response inhibition [55,57,60] and gamma-tACS showed no effect on time estimation [56]. One study using online stimulation to affect phase coherence showed that right-lateralized in-phase theta-tACS increased time estimation accuracy, while anti-phase theta-tACS had no reliable effect [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Online effects of prefrontal tDCS and tACS on resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) were assessed. Furthermore, the online and post-stimulation impact of these intervention protocols on WM-related neural activity and performance was explored, using a similar experimental setting as described elsewhere (i.e., Meiron and Lavidor, 2014;Brauer et al, 2018). Participants were randomly assigned to receive sham stimulation (N = 15), anodal tDCS (N = 15) or theta tACS (N = 14; Figure 1A) over the left dlPFC (l-dlPFC; Figure 1B; see also see section "Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) Parameters").…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tACS was fixed to 2 mA peak-to-peak in a 6 Hz frequency. We selected 6 Hz as this frequency has been widely used in recent tACS WM investigations (i.e., Polanía et al, 2012;Alekseichuk et al, 2016;Violante et al, 2017;Brauer et al, 2018;Röhner et al, 2018;Lang et al, 2019). All stimulation parameters adhered to safety criteria guidelines (Zaghi et al, 2010b;Fertonani et al, 2015;Bikson et al, 2016;Woods et al, 2016;Matsumoto and Ugawa, 2017; see SM for more details).…”
Section: Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (Tes) Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%