2006
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.417
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Matter How Well Done, HIV/AIDS CAM Utilization Papers in 2006 Make Us Sad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further consideration is needed both in terms of gender differences in response to specific CATs; particularly, the use of ingestible substances such as herbs and micronutrients and the observed accelerated ageing process among those living longer from using HAART (Reiss 2009). In the latter, there is a need to provide better options to treat the side effects of HAART; namely, ‘hyperlipidemia, lipodystrophy and cardiomyopathy’ (Standish & Banks 2006, p. 417).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further consideration is needed both in terms of gender differences in response to specific CATs; particularly, the use of ingestible substances such as herbs and micronutrients and the observed accelerated ageing process among those living longer from using HAART (Reiss 2009). In the latter, there is a need to provide better options to treat the side effects of HAART; namely, ‘hyperlipidemia, lipodystrophy and cardiomyopathy’ (Standish & Banks 2006, p. 417).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic review has demonstrated that lifetime CAM use in this population has ranged from 30% to 90% and that, within the previous 6-12 months, 15%-100% of PLWH had accessed a CAM intervention (Lorenc & Robinson, 2013). Prevalence and predictors of CAM use in PLWH have been heavily researched (Agnoletto, Chiaffarino, Nasta, Rossi, & Parazzini, 2006;Gore-Felton et al, 2003;Owen-Smith, McCarty, Hankerson-Dyson & DiClemente, 2012;Tsao, Dobalian, Myers, & Zeltzer, 2005), so much so that Standish & Banks (2006) criticized the volume of this type of research, in light of the relatively few clinical trials in the HIV CAM field. The results of systematic reviews seem to validate this, demonstrating insufficient evidence to direct practice (Hoogbruin, 2011;Mills, Wu, & Ernst, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%