2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Ly α emitters detected around a QSO at z = 6.4: Suppressed by the QSO?

Abstract: Understanding how QSO's UV radiation affects galaxy formation is vital to our understanding of reionization era. Using a custom made narrow-band filter, N B906, on Subaru/SuprimeCam, we investigated the number density of Lyα emitters (LAE) around a QSO at z=6.4. To date, this is the highest redshift narrow-band observation, where LAEs around a luminous QSO are investigated. Due to the large field-of-view of Suprime-Cam, our survey area is ∼5400 cMpc 2 , much larger than previously studies at z=5.7 (∼200 cMpc 2… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The top panel of Figure 10 shows the predictions, which are indistinguishable for a single quasar field. Observations (middle panel; Bañados et al 2013;Mazzucchelli et al 2017;Goto et al 2017;Ota et al 2018) fall within the predicted ranges, which are extremely wide, in part due to Poisson statistics. The only measurement falling outside one of the predicted ranges is that of Goto et al (2017), which did not detect any sources 9 .…”
Section: Environments Of Z ∼ 6 Quasarsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The top panel of Figure 10 shows the predictions, which are indistinguishable for a single quasar field. Observations (middle panel; Bañados et al 2013;Mazzucchelli et al 2017;Goto et al 2017;Ota et al 2018) fall within the predicted ranges, which are extremely wide, in part due to Poisson statistics. The only measurement falling outside one of the predicted ranges is that of Goto et al (2017), which did not detect any sources 9 .…”
Section: Environments Of Z ∼ 6 Quasarsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Solid curves show the number of observed LAEs and continue as dotted when the edge of the field is reached. TheGoto et al (2017) field (green downward-pointing triangles) did not show any sources. Bottom panel : If 10 quasar fields are observed, the model predictions start to be distinguishable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We are cautious, however, that these results are based on the detection of a single LAE in the proximity of one z∼6.6 QSO. Previous studies (Decarli et al 2012;Bañados et al 2013;Mazzucchelli et al 2017b;Goto et al 2017), even if subjected to larger redshift uncertainties, did not report any evidence for an excess of LAEs in the proximity of z∼6 QSOs (but see Decarli et al 2017 for the detection of [C II] bright galaxies in the proximity of z∼6 QSOs). Measurements of the highredshift QSO-galaxy clustering in a statistical fashion is thus fundamental to discern among different scenarios proposed to explain the rapid formation of SMBHs at the end of cosmic reionization.…”
Section: Comparison To Qso-lae Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Both studies report a number of LAEs consistent with (or even lower than) expectations from a blank field. Goto et al (2017), using the Subaru Prime Focus Camera (Suprime-cam) on the Subaru telescope, similarly reported an underdensity of LAEs around the QSO CFHQSJ2329−0301 (z=6.4). It is worth mentioning that at slightly lower redshift, McGreer et al (2014) discovered an LAE in the immediate proximity (with a separation of only 11.4 kpc) of the z∼4.9 QSO SDSSJ0256+0019.…”
Section: Overdensity Of Laes Around the J0305−3150mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…′′ 62 and a 3σ limiting magnitude of 25.46 mag in a 1. ′′ 2 aperture (see also Goto et al 2017). The corresponding quantities for the combined N B906 image are 0.…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%