2011
DOI: 10.1177/0022022111406097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Innate Number Line in the Human Brain

Abstract: Many authors in the field of numerical cognition have adopted a rather nativist view that all humans share the intuition that numbers map onto space and, more specifically, that an oriented left-to-right mental number line (MNL) is localized bilaterally in the intraparietal sulcus of the human brain. We review results from archaeological and historical (diachronic) studies as well as cross-cultural (synchronic) ones and contends that these claims are not well founded. The data actually suggest that the MNL is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a conclusion is consistent with recent findings showing that number-to-space mappings are not as fundamental as previously thought, and that linear number line mappings require cultural practices to be established [31]. Moreover, these observations also seem to match the available records of the history of mathematics, which show no documentation of depictions of number lines proper prior to the 17 th Century [4], [32]. The number line seems to explicitly appear for the first time with the work of John Napier [33] and John Wallis [34] as a response to demands imposed by the conceptualization of more sophisticated mathematical objects, such as logarithms (Napier) and negative squares and their imaginary roots (Wallis).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Such a conclusion is consistent with recent findings showing that number-to-space mappings are not as fundamental as previously thought, and that linear number line mappings require cultural practices to be established [31]. Moreover, these observations also seem to match the available records of the history of mathematics, which show no documentation of depictions of number lines proper prior to the 17 th Century [4], [32]. The number line seems to explicitly appear for the first time with the work of John Napier [33] and John Wallis [34] as a response to demands imposed by the conceptualization of more sophisticated mathematical objects, such as logarithms (Napier) and negative squares and their imaginary roots (Wallis).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Even the few number words in their lexicon are not comparable to Western number words because they represent approximate numbers . Importantly, in the study of Dehaene et al (2008), 22% of the uneducated Amazonian adults failed to map numbers 1–3 in the right order and 37% of the participants exhibited bimodal mapping, using only the end points of the line (Núñez, 2011). …”
Section: Theoretical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preverbal human infants can discriminate among numbers (Strauss and Curtis, 1981; Wynn, 1992; Cordes and Brannon, 2009), though the basis on which they do so is controversial (Ansari and Karmiloff-Smith, 2002; Sophian, 2007; Izard et al, 2009; Núñez, 2011). While early perceptual abilities may provide a foundation on which to map some number terms, subsequent developments are—for typically developing (TD) children—inevitably interwoven with linguistic experiences and language development (Spelke and Tsivkin, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%