2005
DOI: 10.3102/10769986030004353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Humble Pie: The Origins and Usage of a Statistical Chart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 1.6% of printed graphs are 3-dimensional (Zacks, Levy, Tversky and Schiano 2001) though the use of such graphs at scientific meetings may be much larger, because some people like them (Stewart, et al 2009) and software such as Microsoft Excel and PowerPoint makes them easy to create. Pie charts are more frequently used in the popular press than in scientific publications, but even in the popular press, bar charts outnumber pie charts (Spence 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 1.6% of printed graphs are 3-dimensional (Zacks, Levy, Tversky and Schiano 2001) though the use of such graphs at scientific meetings may be much larger, because some people like them (Stewart, et al 2009) and software such as Microsoft Excel and PowerPoint makes them easy to create. Pie charts are more frequently used in the popular press than in scientific publications, but even in the popular press, bar charts outnumber pie charts (Spence 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although pie charts are used very frequently to communicate various statistical facts, the scientific evidence about their usefulness is equivocal. 10,12,13 The first aim of this article is to develop a scale that can be used to assess the graphical literacy skills needed to understand risks in the health domain. To date, graph understanding has not been assessed by any health literacy instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searches identified 4855 potentially relevant articles from the scientific literature. Following title and abstract screening, more than 500 were examined in full text and of those, 55 were deemed eligible . Fourteen additional sources for visuals were identified including websites and reports .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%