2019
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Herman rings for regularly ramified rational maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us use the same notation introduced in the proof of the previous theorem. The proof is as the same as the one given in [9] to show the same conclusion for a totally ramified rational map, which goes as follows. We rewrite (3.1) as…”
Section: Speiser Graphs Of Branched Coverings and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Let us use the same notation introduced in the proof of the previous theorem. The proof is as the same as the one given in [9] to show the same conclusion for a totally ramified rational map, which goes as follows. We rewrite (3.1) as…”
Section: Speiser Graphs Of Branched Coverings and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Generally, the trajectories of the critical points under the iteration of f determine the dynamical behaviors of f on C. Sometimes, certain pattern of critical points eliminates certain type of dynamical behavior. For example, it is proved in [9] that if all preimages of every critical value of f are critical points, then there is no Herman ring in the Fatou set of f . Motivated by this result, we investigate in this paper the existence of such rational maps for degree d ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is known that the Cantor circle Julia sets and Sierpiński carpet Julia sets can appear in McMullen family and the generalized McMullen family (see [5,30]). For the study of singular perturbation of unicritical polynomials, one may also refer to [27], [31], [32], [15] and [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%