2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2002.tb00117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No functional benefit for hDAF-transgenic rat livers despite protection from tissue damage following perfusion with human serum

Abstract: Currently, xenogeneic extracorporeal liver perfusion is used in the treatment of acute liver failure. In order to determine whether transgeneity for human regulatory proteins could improve the functional outcome of the ex‐vivo liver in relation to the histopathological changes, we studied the effect of the humoral mechanism in xenogeneic isolated rat liver perfusion in normal and transgenic rat livers. Isolated rat liver perfusion was performed for 2 h in normal rat livers with Krebs Henseleit (KH) and human s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar data were generated by Luo et al [26]. In another model, a more limited human complement activation and hepatocellular damage in organs transgenic for hDAF did not give rise to any change in liver function [27]. There was no significant difference between group A (xenoperfused hDAF liver) and group B (xenoperfused wild-type liver), or between group C (alloperfused wild-type liver) and group B (xenoperfused wild-type liver).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar data were generated by Luo et al [26]. In another model, a more limited human complement activation and hepatocellular damage in organs transgenic for hDAF did not give rise to any change in liver function [27]. There was no significant difference between group A (xenoperfused hDAF liver) and group B (xenoperfused wild-type liver), or between group C (alloperfused wild-type liver) and group B (xenoperfused wild-type liver).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%