2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence that partnered and unpartnered gay men differ in their preferences for male facial masculinity

Abstract: Women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's faces have been extensively studied. By contrast, little is known about how gay men respond to masculine facial characteristics. One area of disagreement in the emerging literature on this topic is the association between gay men's partnership status and masculinity preference. One study found that partnered gay men showed stronger preferences for masculine faces than did single gay men, while another study found that partnered gay men showed weaker pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homosexual‐identifying men favoured more masculine male faces, whereas heterosexual‐identifying men preferred more feminine female faces, consistent with prior studies (Cassar et al, 2020; Lippa, 2007a, 2007b; Welling et al, 2013; Zheng & Zheng, 2016). This pattern of results is also consistent with the idea that heterosexual‐identifying men's preferences for feminine females are potentially adaptive since women's faces displaying feminine characteristics are generally considered to be more attractive and linked to reproduction (Glassenberg et al, 2010; Little et al, 2011; Thornhill & Gangestad, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homosexual‐identifying men favoured more masculine male faces, whereas heterosexual‐identifying men preferred more feminine female faces, consistent with prior studies (Cassar et al, 2020; Lippa, 2007a, 2007b; Welling et al, 2013; Zheng & Zheng, 2016). This pattern of results is also consistent with the idea that heterosexual‐identifying men's preferences for feminine females are potentially adaptive since women's faces displaying feminine characteristics are generally considered to be more attractive and linked to reproduction (Glassenberg et al, 2010; Little et al, 2011; Thornhill & Gangestad, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This study explored a new perspective on the understanding of the possible relationship between pornography consumption and preferences for facial dimorphism in a combination of social learning and trade-off mate choice (attractiveness or faithfulness) perspectives, revealing that heterosexual-identifying and homosexualidentifying men demonstrated similar psychological mechanisms in dimorphic preference. Homosexual-identifying men favoured more masculine male faces, whereas heterosexual-identifying men preferred more feminine female faces, consistent with prior studies (Cassar et al, 2020;Lippa, 2007aLippa, , 2007bWelling et al, 2013;Zheng & Zheng, 2016). This pattern of results is also consistent with the idea that heterosexual-identifying men's preferences for feminine females are potentially adaptive since women's faces displaying feminine characteristics are generally considered to be more attractive and linked to reproduction (Glassenberg et al, 2010;Little et al, 2011;Thornhill & Gangestad, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%