2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-015-0624-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of superclones in leaf-feeding forms of austrian grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae)

Abstract: The genetic structure of ten grape phylloxera populations, sampled in summer of 2006 and 2007 from four distinct viticultural areas in Austria, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) was analyzed using six SSR markers (Dvit1-Dvit6). Leaf-feeding populations were chosen from similar ecological habitats, where susceptible rootstock hosts have overtaken scions in abandoned vineyards and produce grape phylloxera populations. To study population structures and test for dominating genotypes, po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(46 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scale of response depends on functional attributes, such as the dispersal ability, of the species and on the structure of the landscape itself. The most important scales found in our study for these three pest taxa are consistent with available information on their dispersal abilities (Forneck, Anhalt, Mammerler, & Griesser, 2015;Grasswitz & James, 2008). Moreover, our results corroborate those of recent studies in perennial crops in which the beneficial effects of semi-natural habitats on pest control were greatest at relatively small spatial scales (<250 m radius) (Henri et al, 2015;Thomson & Hoffmann, 2013).…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This scale of response depends on functional attributes, such as the dispersal ability, of the species and on the structure of the landscape itself. The most important scales found in our study for these three pest taxa are consistent with available information on their dispersal abilities (Forneck, Anhalt, Mammerler, & Griesser, 2015;Grasswitz & James, 2008). Moreover, our results corroborate those of recent studies in perennial crops in which the beneficial effects of semi-natural habitats on pest control were greatest at relatively small spatial scales (<250 m radius) (Henri et al, 2015;Thomson & Hoffmann, 2013).…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…As previously found in other regions (Vorwerk and Forneck , , Islam et al , Forneck et al , Riaz et al ), the parthenogenetic nature of the insect in Argentina is confirmed by P sex values, the excess of heterozygous individuals and the significant deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The possible occurrence, however, of sporadic sexual reproduction cannot be discarded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Tests of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium showed the presence of an excess of heterozygosity (F is < 0) in some of the populations. The F is values observed in the commercial vineyard populations are less (negatively) consistent within populations than those previously reported in studies performed in Bsemi-native habitats^, including abandoned rootstock areas with extensive leaf galling populations, research grapevine collections or rootstock nurseries (Forneck et al 2015;Vorwerk and Forneck 2007). MLGs were observed in each sampling region (Supplement Table 1), indicating anholocyclic reproduction in commercial vineyards on both leaves and roots.…”
Section: Genetic Structure: European Vs Native Grape Phylloxera Rangementioning
confidence: 52%
“…In parallel, a principal component analysis was performed by means of the DARwin software (Perrier and Jacquemoud-Collet 2006). Allele frequencies, mean number of alleles per locus, observed heterozygosity (Ho) and unbiased estimates of heterozygosity expected under Hardy-Weinberg assumptions (He) were calculated as previously indicated (Forneck et al 2015). Clonal diversity (k) within populations was calculated for each population as k = G/N, where G is the number of different multilocus genotypes present in the sample and N is the sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%