2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00647.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of juvenile body mass affecting dispersal in male red deer

Abstract: Dispersal is an important mechanism in population dynamics with a sparse empirical basis. Environmental causes of dispersal may work directly or indirectly. In a population with documented negative density-dependent male dispersal, we investigated if the effect of density on dispersal was indirectly mediated through body mass. We analysed the probability of dispersal in 170 juvenile red deer males in Snillfjord municipality, Norway, during a 20-year period of rapid population growth . Body mass and dispersal p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Ozoga and Verme () reported dominant yearling males spent less time in their natal range preceding the breeding season than more subordinate males, and dominance is a function of body mass (Townsend and Bailey , Taillon and Côté ). Debeffe et al () reported that heavier roe deer had a greater propensity for dispersal and dispersed farther, although body mass in red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) did not influence dispersal behaviors (Loe et al ). We found a relationship between larger body sizes and probability of dispersal but not increased dispersal distance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Ozoga and Verme () reported dominant yearling males spent less time in their natal range preceding the breeding season than more subordinate males, and dominance is a function of body mass (Townsend and Bailey , Taillon and Côté ). Debeffe et al () reported that heavier roe deer had a greater propensity for dispersal and dispersed farther, although body mass in red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) did not influence dispersal behaviors (Loe et al ). We found a relationship between larger body sizes and probability of dispersal but not increased dispersal distance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), although studies yielded contrasting results depending on the environmental context (Linklater and Cameron , Loe et al. , Le Galliard et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and 68·8% of male red deer (Loe et al . ) were reported to disperse. There are fewer studies of dispersal distances for large herbivores in general, although the estimate of 4·7 ± 8·4 km for our study site lies within the reported range for roe deer (1·1 ± 0·1 to 7·6 ± 3·0 km: Wahlstrom & Liberg ; Gaillard et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, no effect of body condition on dispersal propensity was found in red deer Cervus elaphus (Loe et al . ) or in Siberian ground squirrels Pteromys volans (Selonen & Hanski ). Furthermore, at the interspecific level, Sutherland et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%