2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.28.446065
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of human genome integration of SARS-CoV-2 found by long-read DNA sequencing

Abstract: A recent study proposed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) hijacks the LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposition machinery to integrate into the DNA of infected cells. If confirmed, this finding could have significant clinical implications. Here, we applied deep (>50x) long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing to HEK293T cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, and did not find any evidence of the virus existing as DNA. By examining ONT data from separate HEK293T cultivars, we resolved … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B) and disproportionately few (23/61, 37.7%) of these were sense oriented to their host gene. Given modest genome-wide L1 integration site preferences, which mainly reflect the underlying distribution of AT-rich sequences, these patterns were likely dominated by post-integration selection, and are concordant with prior results obtained by human analyses (Sultana et al 2019;Smits et al 2021;Flasch et al 2019;Ewing and Kazazian 2010;Attig et al 2018;Smit 1999). Consistent with L1-mediated retrotransposition in humans and other mammals (Jurka 1997;Tang and Liang 2019;Moran et al 1996;Richardson et al 2017;Ewing et al 2020;Smits et al 2021), the L1 and Alu insertions generated TSDs with a median length of 15bp (Fig.…”
Section: Genomic Analyses Of Macaque Retrotranspositionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…1B) and disproportionately few (23/61, 37.7%) of these were sense oriented to their host gene. Given modest genome-wide L1 integration site preferences, which mainly reflect the underlying distribution of AT-rich sequences, these patterns were likely dominated by post-integration selection, and are concordant with prior results obtained by human analyses (Sultana et al 2019;Smits et al 2021;Flasch et al 2019;Ewing and Kazazian 2010;Attig et al 2018;Smit 1999). Consistent with L1-mediated retrotransposition in humans and other mammals (Jurka 1997;Tang and Liang 2019;Moran et al 1996;Richardson et al 2017;Ewing et al 2020;Smits et al 2021), the L1 and Alu insertions generated TSDs with a median length of 15bp (Fig.…”
Section: Genomic Analyses Of Macaque Retrotranspositionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In principle, a single long read can completely resolve a de novo TE insertion present in a heterogeneous cell population, as well as the accompanying TPRT hallmarks 76 . Long-read sequencing can also discover TE insertions in repetitive genomic regions refractory to mapping with short-read approaches 35, 77, 78 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A provocative hypothesis proposed by recent reports is the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 is capable of partial genomic integration, resulting in a somatic source of persistent antigen and sub-genomic RNA [30] . This speculation has been intensely disputed 31 , 32 , 33 , and will demand further examination as a potential source of persistent viral antigen that may be capable of driving protracted inflammation.…”
Section: Persistent Antigen Production By Non-infectious Viral Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%