“…Therefore, we cannot conclude that increased axonal damage corresponds to a higher disability. Similarly, other authors were also unable to demonstrate this association (Henderson et al, ; Oreja‐Guevara, Noval, Manzano, & Diez‐Tejedor, ), although recent studies established a relationship between RNFL thickness and risk of disability progression (Martínez‐Lapiscina et al, ), and rate of RNFL thinning and NEDA‐3 at 2 years (AUC = 0.8) (Pisa et al, ) There may be multiple reasons for this, including the short follow‐up period, patient heterogeneity, the small sample sizes used in most studies, or perhaps because EDSS is not sensitive enough to detect changes in disability when there is no motor impairment. Therefore, future studies should aim to use larger sample sizes, longer follow‐up times, and more sensitive scales capable of detecting subtler changes in disability.…”