2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00430-009-0110-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of chikungunya virus and antibodies shortly before the outbreak on Sri Lanka

Abstract: A massive outbreak of chikungunya disease occurred on Sri Lanka in 2006. Reasons for the explosive nature of the epidemic are being intensively discussed. According to recognised and anecdotal concepts, absence of human population immunity against chikungunya virus (CHIKV) might have supported virus amplification. However, formal proof of concept is lacking. This study determined the prevalence of anti-CHIKV IgG antibodies as well as CHIKV RNA shortly before the outbreak. Two hundred and six human sera were co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The small (5.0%) proportion of patients with serologic evidence of acute or past CHIKV infection compared with that of DENV (54%) [7] suggests the more recent emergence of CHIKV in southern Sri Lanka, and is consistent with a retrospective serosurvey conducted in Sri Lanka’s Central Province [18]. The finding that most (26/28) acute infections were associated with seroconversion and that all but one patient was ≥18 years old also suggests a population lacking immunity to CHIKV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The small (5.0%) proportion of patients with serologic evidence of acute or past CHIKV infection compared with that of DENV (54%) [7] suggests the more recent emergence of CHIKV in southern Sri Lanka, and is consistent with a retrospective serosurvey conducted in Sri Lanka’s Central Province [18]. The finding that most (26/28) acute infections were associated with seroconversion and that all but one patient was ≥18 years old also suggests a population lacking immunity to CHIKV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…There have been only a few serological studies reported in this country on the presence of CHIKV-specific antibodies in patients and these antibodies were seen in 24·7%, 30·4% and 19·0% in suspected dengue patients between 1970–1972 [13], 1973–1974 [14] and in 1984 [15], respectively. In Sri Lanka, although the first outbreak was reported in 2006 [16], our results (samples collected in 2005–2006) indicated 6·1% positivity for CHIKV infection even before the recognition of the outbreak [16]. In this study, detection of anti-CHIKV IgM is a proof of recent CHIKV infection during the collection period and the detection of anti-CHIKV IgG further confirmed by neutralization test indicate the circulating situation of CHIKV in Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Philippines and Vietnam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of the present study is that there was no anti-CHIK IgM or convalescent samples of IgG tested for confirming acute CHIK infection because we conducted this study one year after the outbreak. However, Panning et al [ 20 ] reported no evidence of CHIK antibodies before an outbreak in Sri Lanka, where the last severe CHIK epidemic occurred during the same period in Thailand in 1960s [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%