2018
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0803-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence for unethical amnesia for imagined actions: A failed replication and extension

Abstract: In a recent study, Kouchaki and Gino (2016) suggest that memory for unethical actions is impaired, regardless of whether such actions are real or imagined. However, as we argue in the current study, their claim that people develop "unethical amnesia" confuses two distinct and dissociable memory deficits: one affecting the phenomenology of remembering and another affecting memory accuracy. To further investigate whether unethical amnesia affects memory accuracy, we conducted three studies exploring unethical am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility coheres with evidence that people are able to "suppress" awareness of unwanted memories at both encoding and retrieval 24 . It is also consistent with recent evidence that memories for dishonest behavior (e.g., cheating) are less subjectively vivid than memories of honest actions 25 , and that memories are less accurate when recounting relevant moral rules after cheating 26,27 , relevant story details after hypothetical acts of cheating ( 25 , but see also 28 ), and selfish relative to altruistic behavior 29 . However, it remains an open question whether people who violate their own moral standards actually misremember their behavior in a self-serving direction.…”
Section: Motivated Misrememberingsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This possibility coheres with evidence that people are able to "suppress" awareness of unwanted memories at both encoding and retrieval 24 . It is also consistent with recent evidence that memories for dishonest behavior (e.g., cheating) are less subjectively vivid than memories of honest actions 25 , and that memories are less accurate when recounting relevant moral rules after cheating 26,27 , relevant story details after hypothetical acts of cheating ( 25 , but see also 28 ), and selfish relative to altruistic behavior 29 . However, it remains an open question whether people who violate their own moral standards actually misremember their behavior in a self-serving direction.…”
Section: Motivated Misrememberingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Together, our findings highlight the importance of assessing selfishness as it is perceived by social decision-makers-that is, relative to their own, subjective moral beliefs. More crucially, these findings contribute to a growing literature on the motivated nature of memory [25][26][27][28][29][46][47][48] by supporting the idea that people can misremember not just rules, or hypothetical situations, but also concrete actions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This possibility coheres with evidence that people are able to "suppress" awareness of unwanted memories at both encoding and retrieval 24 . It is also consistent with recent evidence that memories for dishonest behavior (e.g., cheating) are less subjectively vivid than memories of honest actions 25 , and that memories are less accurate when recounting relevant moral rules after cheating 26,27 , relevant story details after hypothetical acts of cheating (Kouchaki and Gino 25 , but see also Stanley et al 28 ), and selfish relative to altruistic behavior 29 . However, it remains an open question whether people who violate their own moral standards actually misremember their behavior in a self-serving direction.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Together, our findings highlight the importance of assessing selfishness as it is perceived by social decision-makersthat is, relative to their own, subjective moral beliefs. More crucially, these findings contribute to a growing literature on the motivated nature of memory [25][26][27][28][29][46][47][48] by supporting the idea that people can misremember not just rules, or hypothetical situations, but also concrete actions. Specifically, these findings suggest that those who violate (as opposed to uphold) their personal standards misremember the extent of their selfishness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The readiness with which we recall events showcasing our positive traits does not imply that we are more likely to forget experiences that portray the self negatively (Stanley, Yang, & De Brigard, 2018). When confronted by our own past shortcomings and failures, it is still possible to achieve a positive view of the self in the present by constructing a life narrative in which negative experiences represent turning points or indications of self-improvement over time (Conway, 2005;Libby & Eibach, 2002;Wilson & Ross, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%