2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence for binding of clozapine, olanzapine and/or haloperidol to selected receptors involved in body weight regulation

Abstract: The underlying mechanisms of antipsychotic (AP)-induced weight gain are unknown, but both central and peripheral AP target receptors could potentially be involved. This study used radioligand binding assays to compare the binding affinities of clozapine, olanzapine and haloperidol for candidate receptors potentially involved in AP-induced weight gain. Selected candidates derived from known pathways involved in body weight regulation included receptors classified as anorexigenic (bombesin receptor subtype 3, ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nanomolar antagonist potency of clozapine at human H 1 Rs is consistent with its binding affinity (Bymaster et al 1996;Kroeze et al 2003;Lameh et al 2007;Nasrallah 2008;Richelson and Nelson 1984;Richelson and Souder 2000;Schotte et al 1996;Theisen et al 2007). A 30-fold-higher antagonist potency has been reported, but it likely resulted from the cell-based assay used, inasmuch as clozapine was 20-50-fold more potent as antagonist than NDMC (Lameh et al 2007;Weiner et al 2004), whereas both compounds displayed here the same nanomolar antagonist potency.…”
Section: Effects Of Clozapine and Its Metabolites At H 1 Receptorssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The nanomolar antagonist potency of clozapine at human H 1 Rs is consistent with its binding affinity (Bymaster et al 1996;Kroeze et al 2003;Lameh et al 2007;Nasrallah 2008;Richelson and Nelson 1984;Richelson and Souder 2000;Schotte et al 1996;Theisen et al 2007). A 30-fold-higher antagonist potency has been reported, but it likely resulted from the cell-based assay used, inasmuch as clozapine was 20-50-fold more potent as antagonist than NDMC (Lameh et al 2007;Weiner et al 2004), whereas both compounds displayed here the same nanomolar antagonist potency.…”
Section: Effects Of Clozapine and Its Metabolites At H 1 Receptorssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…First, we found no correlation between lifetime antipsychotic drug exposure and CB 1 R density or mRNA expression. Second, the existing body of evidence suggests overall that most antipsychotic drugs do not bind the CB 1 R in vitro (Theisen et al, 2007). In rats, antipsychotics do not change the CB 1 R binding in the cortex and striatum (the regions with some of the highest density of CB 1 R) (Sundram et al, 2005;Wiley et al, 2008) but may decrease the CB 1 R in the brainstem and nucleus accumbens (Sundram et al, 2005;Weston-Green et al, 2008), or, in the case of risperidone, may increase CB 1 R binding in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, and amygdala (Secher et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Continuous and Non-continuous Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rodents, olanzapine reduced PYY-binding densities in different parts of the brain (32), indicating that the drug might indeed counteract the central effects of PYY. In a recent study, olanzapine exhibited a negligible affinity for a number of anorexigenic neuroreceptors, including those of CCK (40). Unfortunately, the drug's affinity for GLP-1, PYY, and OXM receptors was not studied.…”
Section: Total Glucagonsmentioning
confidence: 99%