2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No effect of vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 mg/L on treatment outcome in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If such is the case, these findings will be of increasing importance given the temporal trends in vancomycin MICs in MSSA and the slow declines in the fraction of disease caused by MRSA. It is worth acknowledging, however, that other investigators examining this issue have not found a consistent relationship between vancomycin MIC and clinical outcome in invasive staphylococcal infection (31,32). Such discrepancies in the literature might be a consequence of variability in MIC methodologies (33), definitions of primary outcomes, and/or global variability in strain types or intrinsic virulence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If such is the case, these findings will be of increasing importance given the temporal trends in vancomycin MICs in MSSA and the slow declines in the fraction of disease caused by MRSA. It is worth acknowledging, however, that other investigators examining this issue have not found a consistent relationship between vancomycin MIC and clinical outcome in invasive staphylococcal infection (31,32). Such discrepancies in the literature might be a consequence of variability in MIC methodologies (33), definitions of primary outcomes, and/or global variability in strain types or intrinsic virulence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The literature contains conflicting data regarding whether MRSA-vancomycin MICs could actually reflect the prognosis. Some studies have suggested that vancomycin MICs enabled the determination of adverse clinical outcomes (Honda et al, 2011;Han et al, 2012;Rojas et al, 2012;Hope et al, 2013), whereas others have not (Hos et al, 2017;Song et al, 2017;Adani et al, 2018;Bouiller et al, 2018). Because the MIC-guided treatment decision is controversial in low MRSA-vancomycin MICs (≤2 µg/mL), the IDSA also recommends that the actual clinical and microbiological response should be considered as a guide to treatment decisions if the MRSA-vancomycin MIC is low (Liu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%