2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7en00824d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No effect of selected engineered nanomaterials on reproduction and survival of the springtail Folsomia candida

Abstract: Engineered nanomaterials did not affect Folsomia candida reproduction at concentrations up to 6400 mg per kg dry soil. However, significant effects of metal salt exposure were observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both F. candida and E. andrei adult survival were unaffected by exposure to nCuO (p > 0.17), regardless of biosolid amendment (Appendix A: Table A4 and Table A5). The lack of significant effects in adult earthworm survival correspond with other studies conducted with concentrations of nCuO in soil ranging up to 1000 mg Cu/ kg 27,52,53 . For earthworms exposed to CuSO4 in soils without biosolid amendment, there was an effect on adult survival at concentrations > 678 mg Cu/ kg only.…”
Section: Toxicity Testssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both F. candida and E. andrei adult survival were unaffected by exposure to nCuO (p > 0.17), regardless of biosolid amendment (Appendix A: Table A4 and Table A5). The lack of significant effects in adult earthworm survival correspond with other studies conducted with concentrations of nCuO in soil ranging up to 1000 mg Cu/ kg 27,52,53 . For earthworms exposed to CuSO4 in soils without biosolid amendment, there was an effect on adult survival at concentrations > 678 mg Cu/ kg only.…”
Section: Toxicity Testssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For those studies that have been conducted in natural soil environment, most have presented evidence that Cu ENM are generally less toxic then their bulk or ionic counterparts 27,39,52,69 (Chapter 2:, though there is no consensus on this 68,24,69 . Regardless, it is clear that understanding the fate of the Cu ENM in both the soil and exposed organism is needed to understand or assess the risk an ENM may pose in the soil environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In D. melanogaster somatic cells, functionalised CNTs demonstrate low cytotoxicity 47 . The soil arthropod, Folsomia candida, when exposed to CNTs show no detrimental effects on mortality or reproduction 48 . Intrahaemocoelic injection of CNTs, as carried out in the current study, resulted in the distribution of PAMAM-CNTs in cells 48 h after exposure, yet toxicity was extremely low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…22 Tungsten carbide-cobalt (WCCo) NM and copper oxide (CuO) NM were provided by the Sustainable Nanotechnologies Project (SUN) and were purchased from different suppliers (for details see Table 1). As positive controls copperIJII) chloride (CuCl 2 ) and cobalt chloride (CoCl 2 •6H 2 O) were previously used and described by Noordhoek et al (2018). 23 For WCCo-NM, nominal test concentrations were 0-200-400-800-1600-3200-6400 mg WCCo-NM per kg dry soil.…”
Section: Test Compounds and Spiking Of Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As positive controls copperIJII) chloride (CuCl 2 ) and cobalt chloride (CoCl 2 •6H 2 O) were previously used and described by Noordhoek et al (2018). 23 For WCCo-NM, nominal test concentrations were 0-200-400-800-1600-3200-6400 mg WCCo-NM per kg dry soil. CuO-NM were tested at nominal concentrations of 0-200-400-800-1600-3200-6400 mg Cu per kg dry soil.…”
Section: Test Compounds and Spiking Of Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%