2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2781-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No differences in clinical outcomes with the addition of viral load testing to CD4 cell count monitoring among HIV infected participants receiving ART in rural Uganda: Long-term results from the Home Based AIDS Care Project

Abstract: BackgroundWe compared clinical outcomes among HIV-infected participants receiving ART who were randomized to viral load (VL) and CD4 cell count monitoring in comparison to CD4 cell count monitoring alone in Tororo, Uganda.MethodsBeginning in May 2003, participants with CD4 cell counts <250 cells/μL or WHO stage 3 or 4 disease were randomized to clinical monitoring alone, clinical monitoring plus quarterly CD4 cell counts (CD4-only); or clinical monitoring, quarterly CD4 cell counts and quarterly VL testing (CD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with data previously reported in Uganda and Thailand . The Ugandan study compared clinical outcomes among patients with one of three monitoring strategies, including a clinical arm (weekly home visits), CD4 arm (quarterly CD4 cell counts and weekly home visits) and VL arm (quarterly CD4 cell count and VL testing and weekly home visits), over a median follow‐up of three years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are consistent with data previously reported in Uganda and Thailand . The Ugandan study compared clinical outcomes among patients with one of three monitoring strategies, including a clinical arm (weekly home visits), CD4 arm (quarterly CD4 cell counts and weekly home visits) and VL arm (quarterly CD4 cell count and VL testing and weekly home visits), over a median follow‐up of three years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study found no significant difference between the CD4 arm and the VL arm in the rate of new AIDS‐defining events or death (adjusted HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.84) . Following the initial analysis, individuals in the clinical arm were re‐randomized to the other two arms and all participants were followed up for a median follow‐up of 5.2 years . Once again, no association was found between the monitoring arms and new AIDS defining events or death (adjusted HR = 1.19 for CD4‐only vs. CD4‐VL; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.73).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 4 ] Furthermore, initial WHO guidelines did not recommend the use of viral load (VL) testing for routine clinical monitoring, [ 4 ] given the high cost and lack of evidence regarding improved clinical outcomes associated with VL testing. [ 5 7 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%