2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5340-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No difference in strength and clinical outcome between early and late repair after Achilles tendon rupture

Abstract: Purpose This retrospective study aimed to determine the patient-reported and functional outcome of patients with delayed presentation, who had received no treatment until 14 days following injury of Achilles tendon rupture repaired with minimally invasive surgery and were compared with a group of sex-and age-matched patients presenting acutely. Based on the outcomes following delayed presentation reported in the literature, it was hypothesized that outcomes would be inferior for self-reported outcome, tendon e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is related to the incision which is enough to expose the tendon and secure the suture. Our study has no rerupture after surgery, and we also achieved a clinical outcome which was similar to the previous study (15). Minimally incision may be lead to skin necrosis because of excessive retraction, and sural nerve injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is related to the incision which is enough to expose the tendon and secure the suture. Our study has no rerupture after surgery, and we also achieved a clinical outcome which was similar to the previous study (15). Minimally incision may be lead to skin necrosis because of excessive retraction, and sural nerve injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There are only a few studies have been reported on the outcome of repair during the acute-on-chronic time period following delayed presentation (14,15).Anathatee using the Achillon system (Integra, Plainsboro, NJ, USA) to achieve proper approximation of the tendon ends, at 11-31 days following rupture (14).Michael performed end-to-end repair using minimally invasive repair (15).Both of the above two studies used minimally invasive techniques, but no literature has reported the outcomes and feasibility of open reconstruction combined with modi ed suture in the acute-on-chronic period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous studies, we sought to investigate persons who experienced a functional deficit, and therefore, it is not surprising that the average ATRS score in the present study (52 points) was considerably lower than previous reports. 12,19,[55][56][57] On the other hand, these data highlight the fact that these persons have considerable structural changes in both muscle and tendon.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus for the optimal time for surgery, but in the majority of the studies operative treatment was initiated after a conservative approach. It is presumable that this might not affect patient outcomes, as seen in a recent study about a late minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair after 14 days [ 42 ]. Irrespective of the anatomic locations, there might be no relevant symptom improvement 3 months postoperatively, but there may be after 6–12 months with no deterioration after years [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%