2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No difference in insulin stimulated AKT and AS160 phosphorylation but decreased insulin effect on FoxO4 abundance in skeletal muscle of obese and obese type 2-diabetic subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 The role of AS160 in the regulation of GLUT translocation during diabetes and insulin resistance in striated muscle is somewhat controversial. 38,63,64 Some groups have previously reported no difference of AKT and AS160 phosphorylation during diabetes in skeletal muscle. 64 Similarly, we reported no significant change in AS160 in skeletal muscle of untreated diabetic rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 The role of AS160 in the regulation of GLUT translocation during diabetes and insulin resistance in striated muscle is somewhat controversial. 38,63,64 Some groups have previously reported no difference of AKT and AS160 phosphorylation during diabetes in skeletal muscle. 64 Similarly, we reported no significant change in AS160 in skeletal muscle of untreated diabetic rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,63,64 Some groups have previously reported no difference of AKT and AS160 phosphorylation during diabetes in skeletal muscle. 64 Similarly, we reported no significant change in AS160 in skeletal muscle of untreated diabetic rats. In contrast, diltiazem treatment significantly decreased AS160 phosphorylation in the skeletal muscle of the treated diabetic rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%