2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No correlation between joint position sense and force sense for measuring ankle proprioception in subjects with healthy and functional ankle instability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[63][64][65][66][67][68] Interestingly, weak and nonsignificant correlations were found between measures of active position sense and force sense in patients with CAI, suggesting that these measures assess different constructs of somatosensation. 69 Differences in cutaneous sensation have also been demonstrated between CAI and control groups. The CAI groups have displayed poorer plantar sensation as evaluated with both vibrotactile stimuli 70 and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments 71,72 at the heel, base of the fifth metatarsal, and head of the first metatarsal.…”
Section: Sensory-perceptual Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[63][64][65][66][67][68] Interestingly, weak and nonsignificant correlations were found between measures of active position sense and force sense in patients with CAI, suggesting that these measures assess different constructs of somatosensation. 69 Differences in cutaneous sensation have also been demonstrated between CAI and control groups. The CAI groups have displayed poorer plantar sensation as evaluated with both vibrotactile stimuli 70 and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments 71,72 at the heel, base of the fifth metatarsal, and head of the first metatarsal.…”
Section: Sensory-perceptual Impairmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our current dataset, we can conclude that the effect of angle on shoulder force sense behavior is different from shoulder JPS, where both CE and accuracy improved with increased humeral elevation (King et al, 2013;Suprak et al, 2006). The differing behavior between JPS and force sense may be a contributing factor as to why a correlation has not yet been found between them at any joint (Docherty et al, 2004;Kim et al, 2014;Li et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…When a muscle contracts isometrically, the firing rate of muscles spindles does increase due to alpha-gamma motor neuron coactivation, but it is hypothesized that these impulses are filtered out as no movement illusions occur (McCloskey, Gandevia, Potter, & Colebatch, 1983). Another possible reason for lower focus on force sense is that no relationship has been identified between force sense and JPS or kinesthesia at any joint (Docherty, Arnold, Zinder, Granata, & Gansneder, 2004;Kim, Choi, & Kim, 2014;Li, Ji, Li, & Liu, 2016). As JPS and kinesthesia focus on joint angles, which arguably emphasize the mechanical receptor that is considered most important (muscle spindles), this lack of interrelationship between the subdivisions makes it difficult to establish the importance of force sense in clinical or athletic settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the initial injury, overstretched/loosened ligaments and joint capsule may hamper the function of those mechanorecep tors in those structures. Some researchers reported prolonged peroneal muscle reflex latency in injured ankles [2628] , and others reported ankle position sense deficits in passive testing [8,12,29,30] and active testing protocols [12,15,29] . Moreover, it is indicated that the result of position sense testing (active matching of passive positioning) can be used to predict future ankle injuries [14,31] .…”
Section: Recurrent Ankle Sprainmentioning
confidence: 99%