2007
DOI: 10.1300/j465v28n04_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“No-Contact” Interventions for Unhealthy College Drinking

Abstract: Despite the development of brief efficacious interventions, they are not reaching a large proportion of college students who continue to drink in a manner that puts them at risk for harm. Recent efforts have attempted to address this issue through the development of brief alcohol interventions that may be more broadly disseminated to college students. Researchers have adapted a variety of approaches to print and computer-based modalities that do not require direct real-time contact with an interventionist. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For researchers, web-based interventions provide cost efficiency, uniformity of delivery, and the potential for widespread dissemination that is not possible with more labor-intensive, in-person interventions (Portnoy, Scott-Sheldon, Johnson, & Carey, 2008; Zisserson, Palfai, & Saitz, 2007). For college students, web-based interventions allow for anonymity, economy of time, and convenience of access (Koski-Jannes & Cunningham, 2001; Kypri, Saunders, & Gallagher, 2003).…”
Section: Previous Research Using Pnfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For researchers, web-based interventions provide cost efficiency, uniformity of delivery, and the potential for widespread dissemination that is not possible with more labor-intensive, in-person interventions (Portnoy, Scott-Sheldon, Johnson, & Carey, 2008; Zisserson, Palfai, & Saitz, 2007). For college students, web-based interventions allow for anonymity, economy of time, and convenience of access (Koski-Jannes & Cunningham, 2001; Kypri, Saunders, & Gallagher, 2003).…”
Section: Previous Research Using Pnfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevention approaches that are based on personalized feedback may have a number of advantages for addressing college drinking, including low participant burden, low training and supervision requirements, low cost and ease of dissemination, the potential for tailoring intervention content, and the ability to deliver content without face-to-face contact with an intervention specialist (Kypri et al, 2004; Larimer et al, 2007; Neighbors et al, 2004; Saitz et al, 2007; Walters et al, 2007; Zisserson, Palfai, & Saitz, 2007). Research that has examined the value of computerized feedback-based approaches for reducing hazardous drinking has yielded promising evidence of the efficacy of web-based interventions in health care settings (Kypri et al, 2004), judicial affairs (Barnett, Murphy, Colby, & Monti, 2007; Carey, Henson, Carey, & Maisto, 2009) and campus-wide interventions (Hustad et al, 2010; Neighbors et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a scarcity of research exploring the efficacy of individual components of these interventions, and to date there has been limited research specifically exploring the effectiveness of normative feedback for parents of college students. Among college students, social norms interventions can provide an effective approach to reducing alcohol use and negative consequences (for reviews see Carey, Scott-Sheldon, Carey, & DeMartini, 2007; LaBrie, Hummer, Grant, & Lac, 2010; LaBrie, Hummer, Huchting, & Neighbors, 2009; LaBrie, Hummer, Neighbors, & Pedersen, 2008; Larimer & Cronce, 2007; Lewis & Neighbors, 2006; Walters & Neighbors, 2005; Zisserson, Palfai, & Saitz, 2007). The rationale underlying these interventions is that perceptions of what important others believe to be acceptable drinking behavior (perceived injunctive norms) and perceptions of others’ alcohol use (perceived descriptive norms) can directly influence an individuals’ own attitudes and behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%