2017
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No contact allergy to acrylic acid and methacrylic acid in routinely tested dermatitis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…documented the absence of positive reactions, also in patients with (meth)acrylate allergy. 10 As the authors stated, this does not exclude the possibility of false negative results due to the low prevalence of positive patch-test reactions to (meth)acrylates in their consecutive patch tested patients (seven patients, 0.9%). 10 In our study, this prevalence is higher (1.8%), but only two of these eight patients (25.0%)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…documented the absence of positive reactions, also in patients with (meth)acrylate allergy. 10 As the authors stated, this does not exclude the possibility of false negative results due to the low prevalence of positive patch-test reactions to (meth)acrylates in their consecutive patch tested patients (seven patients, 0.9%). 10 In our study, this prevalence is higher (1.8%), but only two of these eight patients (25.0%)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These authors found positive reactions to other (meth)acrylates; these were considered to be possible cross‐reactions. A recent study by Bruze et al on 768 consecutively patch tested patients reported 26 contact allergic reactions to (meth)acrylates in 7 subjects, without any simultaneous positive reactions to acrylic acid (0.1% pet). This article and our reported case highlight the fact that that acrylic acid does not always cross‐react with the methacrylates and ethyl cyanoacrylate, even if it would be more likely that the patient would have reacted to acrylates, as they, at least in theory, may be hydrolysed to acrylic acid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact, the patient's history did not reveal exposure to products containing (meth)acrylates, as also described in a recent case of ACD caused by acrylic acid in transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation . Nevertheless, Bruze et al patch tested acrylic acid in 768 consecutive patients, not observing any reactivity to acrylic acid, especially in their seven patients sensitized to (meth)acrylates . Thus, cross reactivity between acrylic acid and (meth)acrylates remains an open question to be investigated in further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Nevertheless, Bruze et al patch tested acrylic acid in 768 consecutive patients, not observing any reactivity to acrylic acid, especially in their seven patients sensitized to (meth)acrylates. 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%