2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No consistent cooling of the real hand in the rubber hand illusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the temperature measure tentatively suggests a condition-specific effect by revealing a significantly smaller increase of temperature for asynchronous compared to synchronous stroking. This is in line with literature suggesting that a decrease in body temperature links to own-body disembodiment during illusory embodiment of a fake body (Moseley et al, 2008;Salomon, Lim, Pfeiffer, Gassert, & Blanke, 2013; but see also de Haan et al, 2017), or in neurological damage (Moseley et al, 2008; but see also Lenggenhager et al, 2015). As in previous literature, such relatively lower temperature was in our data specifically found for the stimulated hand (Macauda et al, 2015) and only after longer stimulation (cp.…”
Section: Physiological Measures Remain Largely Unchangedsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only the temperature measure tentatively suggests a condition-specific effect by revealing a significantly smaller increase of temperature for asynchronous compared to synchronous stroking. This is in line with literature suggesting that a decrease in body temperature links to own-body disembodiment during illusory embodiment of a fake body (Moseley et al, 2008;Salomon, Lim, Pfeiffer, Gassert, & Blanke, 2013; but see also de Haan et al, 2017), or in neurological damage (Moseley et al, 2008; but see also Lenggenhager et al, 2015). As in previous literature, such relatively lower temperature was in our data specifically found for the stimulated hand (Macauda et al, 2015) and only after longer stimulation (cp.…”
Section: Physiological Measures Remain Largely Unchangedsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…So far, we can only speculate on the reasons for this lack of significant results in the chosen threat-related implicit measures. While generally the relationship between explicit and implicit measures of embodiment manipulations has been questioned (de Haan et al, 2017;Rohde, Luca, & Ernst, 2011;Rohde, Wold, Karnath, & Ernst, 2013), and in the case of HRV a recent study found no differences after altering embodiment in a full-body illusion (Park et al, 2016), it may be that the ecological congruency of the seen environment and body might have impeded an effect on our implicit measures. This is, in our setup participants are actually seeing their own hand and surroundings, with a higher degree of ecological plausibility compared to previous setups (e.g.…”
Section: Physiological Measures Remain Largely Unchangedmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Proprioceptive drift is supported by affective measurements on the real and fake hand. One study found a decrease in the real hand's skin temperature and a touch dulling effect (Moseley et al, 2008), although the result was not replicated in other studies (Rohde et al, 2013;De Haan et al, 2017). Also, the effects of somatosensory inputs to the real hand are reduced, leading to a lower intensity sensation (Folegatti et al, 2009;Zopf et al, 2011b;Kilteni and Ehrsson, 2017).…”
Section: The Rubber Hand Illusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This null finding is in contrast to a previous 3PP-FBI study 20 . The relation of illusory self-identification with the decrease in body temperature is, however, controversial as other studies failed to replicate this finding 43,63 . Although Salomon et al 20 found temperature drops on the participants back and legs, Macauda et al 54 found an effect of the FBI on the hand, but not on the neck temperature, and they proposed that the temperature of visible body parts (the hand but not the neck in their study) can be modulated.…”
Section: Influence Of Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%