2016
DOI: 10.1038/npjqi.2016.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-cloning of quantum steering

Abstract: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering allows two parties to verify their entanglement, even if one party's measurements are untrusted. This concept has not only provided new insights into the nature of non-local spatial correlations in quantum mechanics, but also serves as a resource for one-sided device-independent quantum information tasks. Here, we investigate how EPR steering behaves when one-half of a maximally entangled pair of qudits (multidimensional quantum systems) is cloned by a universal cloning m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
44
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(C11)With Eqs. (C7)-(C11), the upper bound of the mutual information IAsmBsm ≤ 2 log 2 d. (C13)For the simple bipartite case N = 2, the above relation recovers the criterion used by Chiu et al[51] to show no-cloning of EPR steering. For general N ≥ 3, since the measurement operators in the Schmidt bases and those in the locally measurable bases A sm , B sm and C sm commute with each other, we have the relations Eqs.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…(C11)With Eqs. (C7)-(C11), the upper bound of the mutual information IAsmBsm ≤ 2 log 2 d. (C13)For the simple bipartite case N = 2, the above relation recovers the criterion used by Chiu et al[51] to show no-cloning of EPR steering. For general N ≥ 3, since the measurement operators in the Schmidt bases and those in the locally measurable bases A sm , B sm and C sm commute with each other, we have the relations Eqs.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…There has been an increasing interest in EPR steering since it was rigorously defined by mathematical formulation from the perspective of quantum information [7][8][9], i.e., in a network one can verify the entanglement between Alice and Bob without the requirement of trust of Bob's equipment used to perform local measurements at his node by confirming the presence of steering of Alice's system by Bob. This feature makes quantum steering substantial to various quantum information protocols which rely on entanglement by providing extra security [10], such as semi-sided device-independent quantum key distribution [11][12][13] and quantum secret sharing [14][15][16], one-way quantum computing [17], nocloning quantum teleportation [18][19][20], subchannel discrimination [21], and other related protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the extraordinarily challenging character of the fully DI experiments, 1sDI protocols based on steering offer a more feasible approach to performing quantum secure tasks on a network where reliability or tampering of devices, dishonest observers, etc. could be an issue, e.g., 1sDI quantum key distribution [13][14][15], quantum secret sharing [16][17][18], and quantum teleportation [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%