No Cloaks, no Daggers

Beach, Jim

doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748646272.003.0011

Intelligence Studies in Britain and the US 2013

DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748646272.003.0011

|View full text |Cite

No Cloaks, no Daggers

Jim Beach¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is also worth echoing the point made by Jim Beach that the social dimension is still dominated by studies of 'personalities' not of 'personnel' generally, a point also made by Shahan who rightly points out that the search for 'individual and exceptional women' has resulted in a 'patchwork of gender'. 19 It is also worth mentioning that while Chiefs have gone on record in Black and LGBT History Month to apologise for past discrimination and point to the positives today, the detail of what they are apologising for remains hidden. 'My ultimate goal is for more people to consider a career in MI6 and to get rid of the myth that it's all about having studied at Oxford or Cambridge or having advanced hand-to-hand combat skills', Alex Younger said in October 2017, adding: 'That stereotype really couldn't be further from the truth'.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

#ForgetJamesBond: diversity, inclusion and the UK’s intelligence agencies

Lomas¹

2021

Intelligence and National Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diversity and inclusivity remain top priorities for UK intelligence, having been much maligned for the largely white, male stereotype. The Intelligence & Security Committee of Parliament has published a number of reports suggesting that, even in 2018, the UK's agencies were still behind Whitehall. Historically, there have been issues with female, BAME and LGBT representation, with the article placing today's criticism of the agencies in historical context with a particular focus on the period after 1945. The article also examines the position now and the steps taken by the agencies to promote change, suggesting there are grounds for cautious optimism.In February 2021, The Times reported that Britain's foreign intelligence agency, the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS or MI6), was relaxing rules to allow applicants with dual UK nationality, or with one parent being a UK national or having 'substantial ties to the UK', to apply. Sources told the paper it was just the latest move to access a 'larger talent pool', adding: 'We want a diversification of thought, a diverse workforce, not people who all think in similar ways'. 1 Later, marking LGBT History Month 2021, SIS's Chief ('C') Richard Moore followed other agency heads in apologising for the historical treatment of LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) officials and the bar to gay men and women serving in SIS. In a video shared on his Twitter feed, Moore said the ban deprived SIS of 'some of the best talent Britain could offer' and was 'wrong, unjust and discriminatory'. 2 PinkNews also interviewed two LGBT SIS officers. 'I think the legacy of the ban has been . . . helping people understand that LGBT+ people aren't inherently untrustworthy', said 'Leia', a member of SIS's LGBT+ Affinity Group. 'It's drawn a line in the sand', she added. 3 The statements and media coverage mark just the latest in a series of announcements on the agency's commitment to diversity and change. In January 2021, tabloid newspapers reported on an SIS recruitment drive, specifically an advert, headlined 'Tell me a secret', calling for 'individuals with diverse skill sets and life experiences' to apply for part-time and consulting roles. 4 Responding, Moore tweeted his service's commitment to 'flexible working' and 'diversity'. '#ForgetJamesBond', he added, acknowledging that Bond often shaped perceptions of the ideal intelligence officer. 5 Sir Colin McColl, 'C' from 1989 to 1994, once described the fictional intelligence officer as, in his view, 'the best recruiting sergeant in the world', yet successive Chiefs, like Moore, have tried to distance themselves, seeing Bond's legacy as both a blessing and a curse. 6 In October 2016, Moore's predecessor, Alex Younger, admitted he was 'conflicted' about Bond, on the one hand creating a 'powerful brand', although one that seemed exclusively white and male. 'For too long -often because of the fictional stereotypes I have mentioned -people have felt that there is a single quality that defines an MI6 officer', Younger told journalists in ...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

#ForgetJamesBond: diversity, inclusion and the UK’s intelligence agencies

Lomas¹

2021

Intelligence and National Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

No Cloaks, no Daggers

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

#ForgetJamesBond: diversity, inclusion and the UK’s intelligence agencies

#ForgetJamesBond: diversity, inclusion and the UK’s intelligence agencies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About