2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26176-4_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No-Bend Orthogonal Drawings and No-Bend Orthogonally Convex Drawings of Planar Graphs (Extended Abstract)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, every efficient algorithm for testing the existence of planar rectilinear drawings has been eventually subsumed by an algorithm in the more general bend-minimization scenario. This was indeed the case for degree-3 series-parallel graphs with a variable embedding (see [18] and [24]), for degree-3 planar graphs with a fixed embedding (see [20] and [19]), and for degree-3 planar graphs with a variable embedding (see [13] and [8]). Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show two planar rectilinear drawings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, every efficient algorithm for testing the existence of planar rectilinear drawings has been eventually subsumed by an algorithm in the more general bend-minimization scenario. This was indeed the case for degree-3 series-parallel graphs with a variable embedding (see [18] and [24]), for degree-3 planar graphs with a fixed embedding (see [20] and [19]), and for degree-3 planar graphs with a variable embedding (see [13] and [8]). Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show two planar rectilinear drawings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…O(n) [20] O(n 1.5 ) [4] O(n) [13] NP-hard [11] Series-Parallel O(n) [20] O(n 1.5 ) [4] O(n) [18] O(n 3 log n) [7] Outerplanar O(n) [20] O(n) This paper O(n) [17] O(n) This paper Table 1. Complexity of testing for the existence of a planar rectilinear drawing.…”
Section: Planarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rectilinear planarity testing is NP-complete for planar 4-graphs [16], but it is polynomial-time solvable for planar 3-graphs [5,9] and linear-time solvable for subdivisions of planar triconnected cubic graphs [23]. Very recently a linear-time algorithm for rectilinear planarity testing of biconnected planar 3-graphs has been presented [18]. By extending a result of Thomassen [29] about 3-graphs that have a rectilinear drawing with all rectangular faces, Rahman et al [25] characterize rectilinear plane 3-graphs (see Theorem 2.1).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, if the algorithm must preserve a given planar embedding, rectilinear planarity testing can be solved in subquadratic time for general graphs [2,13], and in linear time for planar 3-graphs [22] and for biconnected series-parallel graphs (SP-graphs for short) [7]. When the planar embedding is not fixed, linear-time solutions exist for (families of) planar 3-graphs [10,16,21,24] and for outerplanar graphs [12]. A polynomial-time solution for SP-graphs has been known for a long time [5], but establishing whether there is a linear-time algorithm for this graph family remains a long-standing open problem [1]; to date, the most efficient algorithm for n-vertex SP-graphs has complexity O(n 3 log n) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%