1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(97)00013-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No association of the Ser/Cys311 DRD2 molecular variant with schizophrenia using a classical case control study and the haplotype relative risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not yet clear if the Cys allele confers excess risk for schizophrenia directly or if it is in linkage disequilibrium with a causative allele at another locus. Family-based studies of this association, of which only one currently exists (OR ¼ 1.7), 6 should be considered a high priority if this association is to be confirmed, validated, and widely recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is not yet clear if the Cys allele confers excess risk for schizophrenia directly or if it is in linkage disequilibrium with a causative allele at another locus. Family-based studies of this association, of which only one currently exists (OR ¼ 1.7), 6 should be considered a high priority if this association is to be confirmed, validated, and widely recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of these criteria yielded 24 studies eligible for meta-analysis, of which 23 used case-control designs, 3,4, and one utilized both a case-control and a family-based strategy. 6 Only the case-control samples were included in the metaanalysis.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 S311C has been proposed as a genetic risk factor for schizophrenia following the observation of an excess of S311C variants among schizophrenics. 5 Nevertheless a number of replications failed to confirm the initial report, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] with only one replication in Caucasian schizophrenics. 15 Mood disorders have also been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, 21 of 22 subsequent replication attempts failed, after which the result obtained by Arinami et al 2 became widely regarded as a type-I inferential error and the possibility of an association was considered remote. 3 Yet, as we previously documented, 4 this pattern of nonreplication was most likely attributable to low statistical power among the replication studies which had, on average, a 55.7% chance of detecting an effect as large as that observed by Arinami et al 2 (odds ratio (OR) of 3.1), but only a 7.5% chance of detecting what we identified by metaanalysis 5 as the 'best estimate' of the magnitude of this polymorphism's effect on risk for schizophrenia (OR = 1.3). In addition to the statistical significance of the OR determined from our meta-analysis, the reliability of this association was bolstered by several facts including (1) there was no evidence that the effect was attributable to publication bias, where only positive reports might be accepted into the literature and contribute to the meta-analysis; (2) there was no evidence of heterogeneity among the studies, suggesting that the effect of DRD2 was consistent across samples; and perhaps most importantly, (3) the significance of the overall effect observed by meta-analysis persisted even when the large and influential study by Arinami et al 2 was removed from the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%