Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) was recently proposed as a contributing factor in the pathology of multiple sclerosis. This concept has gained remarkable attention, partly because endovascular neurointervention has been suggested as a treatment strategy. This review summarizes available evidence and provides a critical analysis of the published data. Currently, there is inconclusive evidence to support CCSVI as an etiological factor in patients with multiple sclerosis. Endovascular procedures should not be undertaken outside of controlled clinical trials.
Keywords: chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency, multiple sclerosisThe origin of the hypothesis Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) as a potential etiopathogenic entity in multiple sclerosis (MS) has recently been suggested and gained significant attention.Over the past few years, Zamboni and colleagues were the first to propose and explore this novel and controversial idea [Zamboni et al. 2009b,c,d]. The theory of CCSVI suggests that MS may be causally related to an inflammatory or immune reaction to iron that accumulates in the central nervous system (CNS) secondary to insufficiency of cervical and cerebral venous blood vessels [Zamboni, 2006]. The same investigators detected venous insufficiency by ultrasound and transcranial Doppler. These patterns of venous insufficiency in cranial and cervical blood vessels were seen in patients with MS and absent in control cohorts.In 2010, Zivadinov and colleagues studied 16 patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and eight matched, healthy controls by 3 T scanner using susceptibility-weighted imaging sequence [Zivadinov et al. 2010]. According to the authors, all 16 patients with MS fulfilled the diagnosis of CCSVI compared with none of the healthy controls. In patients with MS higher iron concentrations were found in the thalamus, globus pallidus, and hippocampus. Iron concentration measures were related to longer disease duration and increased disability, and increased MRI lesion burden and brain atrophy. Similar results were reported by Haacke and colleagues in the same year .
Subsequent studiesAs mentioned above, the proposal of CCSVI as an etiological factor or disease modifier in MS is controversial. Subsequent to the initial observations, other investigators conducted their own studies to determine the existence and prevalence of CCSVI in patients with MS and control cohorts.One positive study by Al-Omari and Rousan showed that in 25 patients with MS there was evidence of CCSVI in 84%, whereas none of the 25 controls displayed evidence of cerebral or cervical venous abnormalities [Al-Omari and Rousan, 2010]. There was no blinding of the investigators in this study.All other published studies, however, could not reproduce the findings published by Zamboni and coworkers [Doepp et al. 2010;Krogias et al. 2010;Sundstrom et al. 2010;Wattjes et al. 2010;Yamout et al. 2010]. Doepp and colleagues found no evidence of CCSVI in patients with MS using Doppler criteria [...