2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No association between types of unilateral mandibular condylar abnormalities and facial asymmetry in orthopedic-treated patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Abstract: JIA patients with unilateral condylar abnormalities (deformation or erosion) exhibited significantly more severe dentofacial asymmetries than did the JIA patients without condylar abnormalities and the control subjects. We found the same degree of dentofacial asymmetry when dividing patients with condylar abnormalities into deformation and erosion groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, contrary to our expectations, we did not observe inter-group differences between the three JIA groups in asymmetry-based measures like total posterior height 1 and 2 (No.1,2), and maxillary and mandibular occlusal canting (No.8,9). This could be explained by the classification of the JIA groups based on radiographic appearance; contemporary theory explains the development of dentofacial growth deviation in JIA as a consequence of condylar growth disturbance rather than condylar damage [ 4 , 17 , 34 – 36 ]. Therefore, the radiographic appearance of the condyle may be normal even when growth at that condyle has been impaired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, contrary to our expectations, we did not observe inter-group differences between the three JIA groups in asymmetry-based measures like total posterior height 1 and 2 (No.1,2), and maxillary and mandibular occlusal canting (No.8,9). This could be explained by the classification of the JIA groups based on radiographic appearance; contemporary theory explains the development of dentofacial growth deviation in JIA as a consequence of condylar growth disturbance rather than condylar damage [ 4 , 17 , 34 – 36 ]. Therefore, the radiographic appearance of the condyle may be normal even when growth at that condyle has been impaired.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All proposed morphometric measurements were made for each subject by one author (CKI). Additionally, the radiographic appearance of each TMJ was categorized based on published criteria [ 17 ]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unilateral TMJ involvement (or a more advanced form in one of the joints) may cause uneven growth of the right and left side of the jaw and cause ramus shortening as well as reducing the size mandibular body on the damaged side [ 5 , 28 ]. Consequently, this may lead to increased facial asymmetry [ 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 25 , 26 , 29 ]. In research by Keller et al (2015) [ 10 ], facial asymmetry, assessed independently by a rheumatologist and an orthodontist, was recorded in 37% and 41% of 76 examined JIA patients aged 1.9–18.6 years old, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiological evaluation was blinded to the clinical data. Based on the CBCT scans all of the 39 patients were classified, taking into account the grading system by Billiau et al (2007) [ 21 ] for each of two TMJs, to one of the subgroup: JIA 0-0, JIA 0-1, JIA 0-2, JIA 0-3, JIA 0-4, JIA 1-1, JIA 1-2, JIA 1-3, JIA 1-4, JIA 2-2, JIA 2-3, JIA 2-4, JIA 3-3, JIA 3-4, JIA 4-4 [ 25 ]. In compliance with the inclusion criteria of these study patients with unilateral or bilateral with different scores of the index on both condylar process (when one of the two sides TMJ was affected more severely concerning the other one), joint involvement was qualified for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%