2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010401108357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both they are in a good agreement with experimental data of many authors and with computational results provided by direct numerical integration of the Fokker-Planck equation in linear approximation in Ωτ [17]. Quite recently Felderhof [18] solved this linearized equation by the Galerkin method using a large number of trial functions (the associated Legendre functions). Comparing his "exact result" for the rotational viscosity with (30) and (17), he wrote that "the result of Martsenyuk, Raikher and Shliomis [5] is quite a good approximation, but the result of Shliomis [2] deviates up to 17 percent".…”
Section: Magnetization Equation Derived Microscopicallysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both they are in a good agreement with experimental data of many authors and with computational results provided by direct numerical integration of the Fokker-Planck equation in linear approximation in Ωτ [17]. Quite recently Felderhof [18] solved this linearized equation by the Galerkin method using a large number of trial functions (the associated Legendre functions). Comparing his "exact result" for the rotational viscosity with (30) and (17), he wrote that "the result of Martsenyuk, Raikher and Shliomis [5] is quite a good approximation, but the result of Shliomis [2] deviates up to 17 percent".…”
Section: Magnetization Equation Derived Microscopicallysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(the saturation) when rolling of the particle is replaced by slipping: the field of sufficiently large intensity guarantees constancy of the particle's orientation, not allowing it to twist with the fluid. Note that the result (18) does not depend on a concrete form of the magnetization equation but follows directly from the equation of fluid motion (5). Actually, in the limit under consideration ω p = 0 , so that Eq.…”
Section: Phenomenological Magnetization Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16), (18), and (38) into (37) and keeping only the first term in the regular perturbation solution, we obtaiñ…”
Section: A Regular Perturbation Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetorheology of ferrofluids has been an active area of experimental [1][2][3][4][5][6] and theoretical [7][8][9][10][11][12] research for decades. The focus of most work has been the steady-state response of dilute and semidilute ferrofluids to imposed constant shear and magnetic fields [2,3,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. There has also been some work on the response of ferrofluids to oscillating [3,14,[22][23][24][25][26] and rotating [14,[27][28][29][30][31][32] magnetic fields; however, here again a steady flow has been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments demonstrate that magnetodipolar interparticle interaction changes significantly both the equilibrium [2] and dynamical [3] properties of ferrofluids. Theoretical models of dynamical properties of dilute ferrofluids with vanishing interparticle interactions have been proposed in [4,5,6,7]. These models lead to very accurate results for very dilute ferrofluids but can not explain properties and behavior of ferrofluids where the interparticle interaction is significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%