1988
DOI: 10.1021/bi00408a057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR study of stacking interactions and conformational adjustments in the dinucleotide-carcinogen adduct 2'-deoxycytidylyl-(3 .fwdarw. 5)-2'-deoxy-8-(N-fluoren-2-ylacetamido)guanosine

Abstract: The conformation and dynamics of the dinucleotide d-CpG modified at the C(8) position of the guanine ring by the carcinogen 2-(acetylamino)fluorene has been investigated by high-field 1H NMR spectroscopy. A two-state analysis of chemical shift data has enabled estimation of the extent of intramolecular stacking in aqueous solution as a function of temperature. The stacking, which is mostly fluorene-cytosine, is virtually complete in the low-temperature range. The 500-MHz 1H NMR spectrum consists of two subspec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the dG-unit can correctly pair with an incoming dCTP in the active site by forming a Watson-Crick base pair (14,18,19). The acetylated bulky adducts in contrast, are not bypassed by high-fidelity polymerases because these lesions are fixed in the syn-conformation (10,16,17,(29)(30)(31)(32), independent of the size of the aromatic unit attached to the C8 portion of the dG base (29). Faithful bypass of the acetylated lesions in vivo is achieved by low-fidelity TLS polymerases, with Pol η playing a major role (5-7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the dG-unit can correctly pair with an incoming dCTP in the active site by forming a Watson-Crick base pair (14,18,19). The acetylated bulky adducts in contrast, are not bypassed by high-fidelity polymerases because these lesions are fixed in the syn-conformation (10,16,17,(29)(30)(31)(32), independent of the size of the aromatic unit attached to the C8 portion of the dG base (29). Faithful bypass of the acetylated lesions in vivo is achieved by low-fidelity TLS polymerases, with Pol η playing a major role (5-7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the Introduction, several studies have shown that the binding of acetoxyAAF distorts the structure of the DNA (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) and other studies have indicated that altering the structure of a DNA sequence affects the activity of restriction enzymes on that sequence (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Thus the inhibitions observed arise from the presence of AAF adducts near the putative restriction enzyme cleavage sites.…”
Section: T G T G a G C G C T G T T G C T A A G T G *2258 A T G A Gcagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies suggested that AAF adducts can produce base displacement type distortions (8)(9)(10) or B-Z structural conversions (11)(12)(13). Krugh and co-workers recently presented NMR data suggesting that the binding of an AAF adduct leads to the flipping of the adduct-bound guanine to the syn conformation with concommitant disruption of the surrounding helix (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, lambda exonuclease is a highly processive enzyme which is sensitive to regions of altered DNA structure, such as denatured regions (9). Evidence suggests that the binding of acetoxyAAF distorts the structure of the DNA around the binding site (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). The lambda exonuclease would be inhibited from digestion in such regions and thus an attempted digestion of acetoxy AAF bound DNA fragments would produce partially digested fragments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These properties make lambda exonuclease an ideal probe for locating DNA sequences which might be structurally altered by the presence of bound acetoxyAAF moieties. Lambda exonuclease activity is inhibited by the presence of denaturation such as is believed to occur upon formation of acetoxyAAF adducts (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Due to such inhibition, enzyme digestion is prematurely halted, resulting in subfragments of the original Hinf I fragment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%