1991
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(91)91794-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR study of spin fluctuations in YBa2Cu3O6+x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the contribution by Berthier et al [11]). I will use the principal axis convention by Berthier et al [11], who label the principal axis of the hyperfine interaction along the Cu-O-Cu bond by Z (parallel to the b-axis) and the other principal axes by X ( parallel to the c-axis) and Y (parallel to the a-axis). For the other oxygen in the CuO 2 plane the (XYZ) axis system is rotated by ~/2 about the X-axis.…”
Section: (B) 170(2 3) In the Cuo 2 Planementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the contribution by Berthier et al [11]). I will use the principal axis convention by Berthier et al [11], who label the principal axis of the hyperfine interaction along the Cu-O-Cu bond by Z (parallel to the b-axis) and the other principal axes by X ( parallel to the c-axis) and Y (parallel to the a-axis). For the other oxygen in the CuO 2 plane the (XYZ) axis system is rotated by ~/2 about the X-axis.…”
Section: (B) 170(2 3) In the Cuo 2 Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 lists some representative values for the hyperfine interaction parameters as far as they could be determined experimentally. Slichter et al [9], Takigawa et al [52] and others [10,11,35,57] analyzed very carefully the 63K Knight shift and spin lattice relaxation anisotropy and were able to draw some conclusions about the 63Cu hyperfine interaction. A more direct approach was used by Yoshinari et al [58] who applied the JaccarinoClogston plot of Knight shift versus susceptibility in order to extract the hyperfine interactions of 63Cu and 170 in cuprate superconductors.…”
Section: (B) 170(2 3) In the Cuo 2 Planementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This observation is explained by the occurrence of a pseudo spin gap in neutron scattering experiments [39,40]. This volume contains a number contributions addressing this aspect [19, [41][42][43][44]. The lines drawn through the data points correspond to the expression [19,45]:…”
Section: Antiferromagnetic Fluctuations and Spin Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%