2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2006.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR studies of BPTI aggregation by using paramagnetic relaxation reagents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If access to these surfaces is inhibited on dimerization, the loss of signals in the contact region is reversed. 16 PRE studies on SeR13 were carried out using two different protein concentrations (0.1 and 1.9 mM) in the presence of 1 and 2.5 mM Gd-DTPA respectively. Amide resonances that experienced a protection from Gd- Figure 4(A), where the differences in intensity compared to a standard containing no Gd-DTPA for each condition were normalized and compared to the mean.…”
Section: Concentration-dependent Chemical Shift Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If access to these surfaces is inhibited on dimerization, the loss of signals in the contact region is reversed. 16 PRE studies on SeR13 were carried out using two different protein concentrations (0.1 and 1.9 mM) in the presence of 1 and 2.5 mM Gd-DTPA respectively. Amide resonances that experienced a protection from Gd- Figure 4(A), where the differences in intensity compared to a standard containing no Gd-DTPA for each condition were normalized and compared to the mean.…”
Section: Concentration-dependent Chemical Shift Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extrapolated RDC values from the two alignment media are then used to determine the symmetry axis of the dimer, allowing the dimer models to be built using the same simple grid search. A paramagnetic perturbation study, [15][16][17][18][19][20] based on shielding of the dimer interface from spin relaxation enhancements has also been added to validate the structures found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For identifying a protein-protein binding interface, solvent PREs are measured for the free and complexed forms, where the primary protein of interest is NMR visible (i.e., 15 N and/or 13 C labeled) and the other is NMR invisible (i.e., at natural isotopic abundance). Upon protein-protein complex formation, the previously exposed binding surface will become internally buried, effectively decreasing the solvent-PRE measured for the nuclei at the binding interface (see Figures 1E-G) (Arumugam et al, 1998;Bernini et al, 2006a;Garimella et al, 2006). In theory, the same protocol may be repeated upon reversing the labeling scheme to pinpoint residues from the seconds protein that reside at the interface of the complex.…”
Section: Solvent-paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement (Pre)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bernini et al, 2006; Eichmueller and Skrynnikov, 2007; Peterson et al, 2008; Wu et al, 2007; Yang et al, 1996) As a particular example of non-specific short-range PRE perturbation, we cite the work of Lee et al on the weakly associating NESG target, SeR13. (Lee et al, 2010) This study compared Gd-DTPA induced relaxation perturbations at higher and lower protein concentrations to identify the dimer interface.…”
Section: Interaction Interface Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%