2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR relaxometry interpretation of source rock liquid saturation — A holistic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the elimination of all pixels with intensity equal to the background values, the basic images were generated (Figure 4). 3D (for all slices) porosity distribution in the sample was normalized to the value of 13.90 ± 0.01% obtained from 1D‐ T 2 experiment conducted in a low magnetic field (0.05 T; see Section S1, Table S1 and Figure S4 in Supporting Information S1), which is the method of choice for the accurate determination of total porosity (Krzyżak, Habina‐Skrzyniarz et al., 2020; Mukhametdinova et al., 2021). The images in Figure 4 additionally depict slice‐to‐slice porosity distribution, which after normalization to 1D‐ T 2 , can be characterized quantitatively (see Section 4.2) There is only one reservation regarding such normalization, that the contribution to the total porosity of 0.425% is underestimated via DTI due to considerable relaxation mechanisms in proton populations with T 2 ≤ TE .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the elimination of all pixels with intensity equal to the background values, the basic images were generated (Figure 4). 3D (for all slices) porosity distribution in the sample was normalized to the value of 13.90 ± 0.01% obtained from 1D‐ T 2 experiment conducted in a low magnetic field (0.05 T; see Section S1, Table S1 and Figure S4 in Supporting Information S1), which is the method of choice for the accurate determination of total porosity (Krzyżak, Habina‐Skrzyniarz et al., 2020; Mukhametdinova et al., 2021). The images in Figure 4 additionally depict slice‐to‐slice porosity distribution, which after normalization to 1D‐ T 2 , can be characterized quantitatively (see Section 4.2) There is only one reservation regarding such normalization, that the contribution to the total porosity of 0.425% is underestimated via DTI due to considerable relaxation mechanisms in proton populations with T 2 ≤ TE .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mukhametdinova et al compared several T 1 −T 2 interpretation schemes and proposed a modification in which the existing T 1 − T 2 interpretation scheme is applied to the target area. 24 However, the measurement environment based on an NMR core analyzer in the laboratory is different from that in the NMR logging field, a few cores may not reflect the rock properties of the whole area, and the cost of shale coring is high. During the exploration and development stage, coring in substantial amounts is unlikely and not recommended due to economic factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T 2 relaxation), additional parameters are employed (i.e. T 1 relaxation or diffusion) to obtain so-called 2D NMR maps 8 10 which can theoretically help to separate these overlapping bitumen and water signals. Application of 2D maps showed considerable success in fluid saturation evaluation, compared to 1D T 2 relaxation distribution analysis, since T 1 relaxation or diffusion of reservoir fluids can be sufficiently different, thus enabling relatively simple separation of their signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%