2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10858-017-0101-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR assignments of sparsely labeled proteins using a genetic algorithm

Abstract: Sparse isotopic labeling of proteins for NMR studies using single types of amino acid (15N or 13C enriched) has several advantages. Resolution is enhanced by reducing numbers of resonances for large proteins, and isotopic labeling becomes economically feasible for glycoproteins that must be expressed in mammalian cells. However, without access to the traditional triple resonance strategies that require uniform isotopic labeling, NMR assignment of crosspeaks in heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be possible with the addition of additional data types. 15 N-filtered NOEs have proven very valuable in the assignment of HSQC crosspeaks in other applications (Gao et al 2017; Gao et al 2016). 13 C-filtered NOEs for methyl groups would have similar value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This should be possible with the addition of additional data types. 15 N-filtered NOEs have proven very valuable in the assignment of HSQC crosspeaks in other applications (Gao et al 2017; Gao et al 2016). 13 C-filtered NOEs for methyl groups would have similar value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penalties were assigned based on the occurrence of assignments carrying a one or zero (~10 for ones and 0 for zeros) and added to an overall assignment score. As in the original description of the program (Gao et al 2017), score contributions for agreement of measured and predicted chemical shifts (calculated using the program PPM_ONE) (Li and Brüschweiler 2015) were represented as root-mean-square-deviations (RMSDs) normalized to 1 for deviations equal to estimated errors. Similarly, score contributions for RDCs came from RMSDs of measured versus predicted values, normalized and adjusted for information content.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations